Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking Issue for slice::reverse in const contexts #100784

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
clarfonthey opened this issue Aug 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 3 tasks

Tracking Issue for slice::reverse in const contexts #100784

clarfonthey opened this issue Aug 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@clarfonthey
Copy link
Contributor

clarfonthey commented Aug 20, 2022

Feature gate: #![feature(const_reverse)]

This is a tracking issue for usage of slice::reverse in const contexts.

Public API

impl<T> [T] {
    pub const fn reverse(&mut self);
}

Steps / History

Unresolved Questions

  • None yet.

Footnotes

  1. https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-lifecycle/stabilization.html

@clarfonthey clarfonthey added C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 20, 2022
@vilgotf
Copy link

vilgotf commented Jul 23, 2023

This feature & implementation was removed in 63e0ddb

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Sep 8, 2024

Indeed, this got removed in #110393.

@RalfJung RalfJung closed this as completed Sep 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants