Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustc armv7 gnueabihf tarballs since 07-23 package files for x86-64 #43450

Closed
hdhoang opened this issue Jul 24, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

rustc armv7 gnueabihf tarballs since 07-23 package files for x86-64 #43450

hdhoang opened this issue Jul 24, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@hdhoang
Copy link
Contributor

hdhoang commented Jul 24, 2017

Reproduction:

$ wget -O rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2017-07-23/rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
$ tar xf rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rustc/bin/
$ file rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rustc/bin/rust*c
rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rustc/bin/rustc:     ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=6cd5b2aab6699d6026ad53d7e8456dbb86fe40a3, not stripped
rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rustc/bin/rustdoc:   ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=35347f46181fd4543575852d2cee9eaef6d531d1, not stripped

Expected result, from 2017-07-22 tarball:

rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rustc/bin/rustc:     ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, ARM, EABI5 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3, for GNU/Linux 3.2.72, not stripped
rustc-nightly-armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/rustc/bin/rustdoc:   ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, ARM, EABI5 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3, for GNU/Linux 3.2.72, not stripped

AFAICT, cargo and rls tarballs are okay.

@xen0n
Copy link
Contributor

xen0n commented Jul 24, 2017

All non-x86 rustc tarballs are borked. I've seen x86_64 binaries for MIPS64el too.

Almost certainly #43059, but I'm not particularly familiar with that code.

@xen0n
Copy link
Contributor

xen0n commented Jul 24, 2017

cc @Mark-Simulacrum @alexcrichton

@xen0n
Copy link
Contributor

xen0n commented Jul 24, 2017

Same as #43427.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Indeed! Closing in favor of #43427

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants