-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Velocyto- Seurat - invalid class “LogMap” object: Duplicate rownames not allowed #177
Comments
Hi, please check for duplicate column names in the infercnv object's expression and the counts matrix. If you do, then getting rid of them will help. I was running CNV analysis and had to remove duplicate column names to get rid of the error. |
Hi. I got the same error, have you solved yet? |
Also hoping for a solution. |
@fariznazir Can you clarify what you mean? The person who originally made this issue does not have an object called infercnv. The error refers to rownames. Is invercnv part of the loom file? are colnames converted to rownames at some point? |
Hi, I had the same issue when running as.seurat() with the loom file I generated but without prob when running with the loom file from SCG71.loom (curl::curl_download(url = 'http://pklab.med.harvard.edu/velocyto/mouseBM/SCG71.loom', destfile |
I'm running into the same issue. Anyone managed to solve it? |
Hello, first thank you for developing such great tools
I am Ruba PhD student in Germany and I am doing scRNAseq analysis for my data, I wanted to check the velocity and so I generated the loom files by velacyto, I wanted to continue with Seurat with .r but unfortunately am facing some errors, I looked many published errors, tried to downgrade the Matrix Package (where Seurat didn't work anymore) I had to upgrade it again, the error am facing is | | 0%Error in validObject(.Object) :
invalid class “LogMap” object: Duplicate rownames not allowed
taking into account there's no duplicated rownames could somebody kindly look into it and give an advice if something could be done so I can go through the velocity analysis in the end.
thank you in advance
Kind regards!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: