Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:add gitxn, gitxna and gitxnas #628

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Mar 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

vuvoth
Copy link
Contributor

@vuvoth vuvoth commented Mar 23, 2022

Proposed Changes

  • Add gitxn, gitxna and gitxnas opcode
  • Test case for opcodes.

Note: I use inheritance to extends gitxn from gtxn and gitxna from gtxna. Please check code for more details.

Please review it! Thanks <3.

@vuvoth vuvoth changed the title Feat/add gitxn and gitxna feat:add gitxn and gitxna Mar 23, 2022
@vuvoth vuvoth added enhancement New feature or request runtime labels Mar 23, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@sczembor sczembor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left few comments

Copy link
Contributor

@sczembor sczembor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vuvoth vuvoth changed the title feat:add gitxn and gitxna feat:add gitxn, gitxna and gitxnas Mar 24, 2022
@vuvoth vuvoth requested a review from sczembor March 28, 2022 11:42
Copy link
Contributor

@sczembor sczembor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left few comments, otherwise LGTM

@vuvoth vuvoth merged commit 46ad6b3 into develop Mar 28, 2022
@vuvoth vuvoth deleted the feat/add-gitxn-and-gitxna branch March 28, 2022 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request runtime
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants