Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schematic review - v1.1 #24

Open
kaolpr opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

Schematic review - v1.1 #24

kaolpr opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 10 comments
Milestone

Comments

@kaolpr
Copy link
Member

kaolpr commented Feb 8, 2024

Use this issue for small corrections required for schematics. List them as tasks list. If a more complex problem is noticed feel free to create a new issue. Please mention created issues resulting from the review in this issue.

@kaolpr kaolpr added this to the v1.1 milestone Feb 8, 2024
@skuchars
Copy link
Collaborator

skuchars commented Mar 10, 2024

@skuchars
Copy link
Collaborator

skuchars commented May 6, 2024

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

@skuchars whare are you with layout?

@skuchars
Copy link
Collaborator

I have been doing it bit by bit for some time, but I can maximize effort now so hopefully I could finish most of the issues in few days time; then I will make a commit. But still any of my schematic changes weren't actually approved so it would be great if that can happen soon, for example by @kaolpr.

@skuchars
Copy link
Collaborator

skuchars commented Nov 3, 2024

@gkasprow

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

gkasprow commented Nov 3, 2024

pls make sure you follow the newest DIOT template
sinara-hw/DIOT-Template#1

@skuchars
Copy link
Collaborator

Questions:

  1. In sequencing circuit posted in Sinara@DIOT Power Sequencing meta#91 (comment) there are absent transistors T3 and T4, but they do appear in the newest DIOT template. Which version should I implement, probably the newer one?
  2. In LVDS schematic IC32 is fully used (all sub-parts, A-D), was this intentional or I can drop this design and copy new DIOT template (only A B sub-parts in use)?

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

  1. yes
  2. it's better to use all parts, this lowers RDSon

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

  1. I fixed that in the template

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants