-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mutable and immutable resources #279
Comments
Currently covered by WAC-Allow.
(Not saying it’s the best option though.)
|
With WAC one can set resource to read-only but at any time make it writable again, does it satisfy your immutability requirement @csarven ? I think for each requirement would be useful to have at least one use case documented to illustrate it. |
I don't think WAC-Allow addresses what I had in mind about immutable resources, but correct me if I have missed. There may exist an agent that's can't alter a resource but other agents may through alternative routes, or a server may due to any reason. There may even be bit rot. I was loosely considering https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#change-over-time in particular "Some RDF sources may, however, be immutable snapshots of another RDF source, archiving its state at some point in time" and so how to approach that. The social and technical mechanism would need to provide some assurance/promise and verifiability that a resource's state did not mutate in contrast to mutable resources which are often how RDFSources treated. So giving consideration to signatures, digests, fixity, Memento.. Relates to https://github.com/solid/solid-spec/issues/204 . |
Copying from duplicate #459
|
See Also: ocfl. ocfl, and bagit are used by GLAM people, for storing immutable, long term object archives. |
Clarify the notion of mutable and immutable resources.
Describe the interface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: