Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DPB] Unable to breakout a port on Mellanox SN2700 #8993

Closed
tw0byt3 opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #9075
Closed

[DPB] Unable to breakout a port on Mellanox SN2700 #8993

tw0byt3 opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #9075
Assignees

Comments

@tw0byt3
Copy link

tw0byt3 commented Oct 18, 2021

Description:

The Dynamic Port Breakout feature is not working as expected on the latest master image

Describe the results you received:

config interface breakout Ethernet0 4x10G[25G] -y

Running Breakout Mode : 1x100G[50G,40G,25G,10G]

Target Breakout Mode : 4x10G[25G]

Ports to be deleted :
{
"Ethernet0": "100000"
}
Ports to be added :
{
"Ethernet0": "10000",
"Ethernet1": "10000",
"Ethernet2": "10000",
"Ethernet3": "10000"
}

After running Logic to limit the impact

Final list of ports to be deleted :
{
"Ethernet0": "100000"
}
Final list of ports to be added :
{
"Ethernet0": "10000",
"Ethernet1": "10000",
"Ethernet2": "10000",
"Ethernet3": "10000"
}
Note: Below table(s) have no YANG models:
KDUMP, MCLAG_DOMAIN, MCLAG_INTERFACE, MCLAG_UNIQUE_IP, SNMP, SNMP_COMMUNITY, XCVRD_LOG,
sonic_yang(3):All Keys are not parsed in FEATURE
dict_keys(['dhcp_relay'])
sonic_yang(3):exceptionList:["'set_owner'"]
sonic_yang(3):Data Loading Failed:All Keys are not parsed in FEATURE
dict_keys(['dhcp_relay'])
Data Loading Failed
All Keys are not parsed in FEATURE
dict_keys(['dhcp_relay'])
ConfigMgmt Class creation failed
Failed to break out Port. Error: Failed to load the config. Error: ConfigMgmtDPB Class creation failed

Describe the results you expected:

config interface breakout should work without errors

@dgsudharsan
Copy link
Collaborator

@arlakshm Can you please check the FEATURE yang model to include kubernetes related fields?

@arlakshm arlakshm self-assigned this Oct 26, 2021
@arlakshm arlakshm linked a pull request Oct 27, 2021 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@stepanblyschak
Copy link
Collaborator

#9276

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants