-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is it time for Java8+ support? #614
Comments
Thanks, it's very helpful to lay out the factors affecting the choice of Java version support. I added the text as a Wiki page here: What Version of Java Should This Project Support? Let me know if you have any issues or concerns with the Wiki page content. I will leave this issue active for a week or so in case anyone wants to chime in. |
Comments by @johnjaylward in #615 I don't believe the original author would have any qualms about updating the Java requirements. In 2014, he added support for java 1.8 (see commit a9a0762). It was later reverted (I believe after he did the hand-off to you). I don't believe he'd be against the update today if we ensured functionality. Also, Some historical tickets referencing old support for java 8 (requesting lower version) as well as feature requests for java8+: |
Please address how we can ensure that user projects won't break if they happen to be using Java 1.6, Android developers in particular. This is my main concern. |
Android 7 itself is already pretty old (as noted above this would be from 2016). Personally, I don't have any qualms about dropping support for anything that old. Sadly, for Java itself, there probably isn't a reliable way to check market share of java install/tools, but my gut feeling, looking at IDE and Toolchain support over the last year, is that most developers WERE using 8 and are now using or switching to 11 or newer. Java 7 and 8 provided so many improvements to developers over Java 6, that I find it hard to believe that anyone has stuck with 6 this long on purpose. |
Here are the results of a developer survey published 1.5 years ago that show 3% of developers using Java7 or lower: https://snyk.io/blog/developers-dont-want-to-leave-java-8-as-64-hold-firm-on-their-preferred-release/ |
Now that Java 17 is the new LTS version (java 11 still being in LTS support), Here are some highlights of features/improvements added to Java 12-17 that may be applicable to this project:
|
@johnjaylward Which feature are you referring to with "Primitive Classes" for JDK 16? As far as I can see there is no such feature in https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/16/ and Project Valhalla is still not visible on the horizon. |
This is the article I pulled from I believe : https://www.infoworld.com/article/3569150/jdk-16-the-new-features-in-java-16.html |
The teaser exaggerates/shortens this a bit. The feature only adds new annotations to some classes, deprecates some already deprecated constructors 'for removal' and adds a new type of warning for synchronization, all in preparation for Valhalla. There are no actual value-based classes in this JEP https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/390 |
I believe this was resolved with #741 unless someone else has more to add to the discussion |
Closing due to merge of #741 |
Oracle itself has ended support for Java8 and many companies are starting to move off of 8 and onto at least 11 (the next [and current] LTS after 8). Oracle has the next LTS at 17 due Sept 2021.
Java 8 was released in 2014 and Java 11 in 2018. Java 6 was release first in 2006 and java 7 released in 2011. This puts us at requiring a fairly ancient version at this point. The last public release of Java6 was 2015 (6 years ago)
Some of the main reasons for us originally maintaining such an old version were:
I think at this time we can probably just drop the "embedded" limitation. Many of those devices are extremely old, and older versions of the library should be usable in those environments.
For Android, I did some digging, and it looks like Java 8 is still the "best" supported version, but Java 11 is supported through a "desugaring" tool that Android provides
It appears that for now, bumping from Java 6 to 8 (or better 11) is a good move. Android also appears to be moving away from "java" as a language and instead to Kotlin. This may mean that if we switch to a higher language version (12+), Android may not support some newer APIs included in the new version (like the addition of
java.time
in Java 8)I think moving to at least Java 8 (preferably Java 11) would be beneficial in supporting the following options:
Introduced with Java 7
try-with-resources
Introduced with Java 8 (LTS until 2022-03)
Optional
support (feature requests Java8 Optional? #177, Support for Java 8 optionals #409)opt
/get
functions for them?)stream
classesHashMap
key collisionsIntroduced in Java 9
Introduced in Java 10
Introduced in Java 11 (LTS until 2023-09)
JSONObject.NULL
object)Introduced with Java 12
instanceof
Introduced with Java 13
Introduced with Java 14
Introduced with Java 15
Introduced with Java 16
Integer
class would be treated asint
primitive as far as the compiler/JVM are concerned). This would reduce boxing efforts when working with wrapper classesIntroduced with Java 17 (LTS until 2026-09 or later, date subject to change)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: