- Proposal: SE-0068
- Author(s): Erica Sadun
- Status: TBD
- Review manager: Chris Lattner
Within a class scope, Self
means "the dynamic class of self
". This proposal extends that courtesy to value types and to the bodies of class members
by renaming dynamicType
to Self
. This introduces a universal way to refer
to the dynamic type of the current receiver.
Under this proposal Self
is a special associated type member that exists
in every type, just like dynamicType
currently does. Unifying these concepts,
eliminates the dynamicType
keyword and replaces it with x.Self
.
A further static identifier, #Self
expands to static type of the code it appears within, completing the ways code may want to refer to the type it is declared in.
This proposal was discussed on the Swift Evolution list in the [Pitch] Adding a Self type name shortcut for static member access thread and [Pitch] Rename x.dynamicType
to x.Self
It is common in Swift to reference an instance's type, whether for accessing
a static member or passing a type for an unsafe bitcast, among other uses.
At this time, you can either fully specify a type by name or use self.dynamicType
to access an instance's dynamic runtime type as a value.
struct MyStruct {
static func staticMethod() { ... }
func instanceMethod() {
MyStruct.staticMethod()
self.dynamicType.staticMethod()
}
}
Introducing Self
addresses the following issues:
dynamicType
remains an exception to Swift's lowercased keywords rule. This change eliminates a special case that falls out of Swift standards.Self
is shorter and clearer in its intent. It mirrorsself
, which refers to the current instance.- It provides an easier way to access static members. As type names grow large, readability suffers.
MyExtremelyLargeTypeName.staticMember
is unwieldy to type and read. - Code using hardwired type names is less portable than code that automatically knows its type.
- Renaming a type means updating any
TypeName
references in code. - Using
self.dynamicType
fights against Swift's goals of concision and clarity in that it is both noisy and esoteric. self.dynamicType.classMember
andTypeName.classMember
may not be synonyms in class types with non-final members.
This proposal introduces Self
and #Self
.
-
Self
equates to and replacesself.dynamicType
. You will continue to specify full type names for any other use. Joe Groff writes, "I don't think it's all that onerous to have to writeClassName.foo
if that's really what you specifically mean." -
#Self
expands to the static type of the code it is declared within. In value types, this is always the same asSelf
. In reference types, it refers to the declaring type.#Self
will offer a literal textual replacement just like#file
, etc.
Not at this time
Thanks Sean Heber, Kevin Ballard, Joe Groff, Timothy Wood, Brent Royal-Gordon, Andrey Tarantsov, Austin Zheng