You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 7, 2018. It is now read-only.
I would like to propose making the ‘process’ model visible in the create window calls. As per your presentation, Electron (by default) offers a separate process per window and OpenFin offers a shared process (with some sharding to allow process expansion). I would like to extend the API so that the app can check the container capabilities. The app can also request a particular process model and containers can reject calls they can not support. This may require the introduction of ‘window group names’. Clearly the parameter should default in a sensible way so that most apps do not need to worry about this.
I think that is a very good idea. Once this PR is merged #207 we will have a consistent process model between OpenFin and Electron. This was the easiest way to create a uniform baseline, which we can then extend to accommodate different modes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Via email from Leslie @ Tick42
I think that is a very good idea. Once this PR is merged #207 we will have a consistent process model between OpenFin and Electron. This was the easiest way to create a uniform baseline, which we can then extend to accommodate different modes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: