Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(protocol): improve DelegateOwner to have an optional L2 admin #17445

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

dantaik
Copy link
Contributor

@dantaik dantaik commented May 31, 2024

Before this PR, DelegateOwner relies on the bridge to function before it can perform any owner functions. To enable this contract to work even in case of bridge failure, I added a L2 admin which can perform owner functions too. This admin address shall be a multisig itself.

When bridge is battle tested and stable, we can set the admin to 0x0.

@dantaik dantaik marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2024 07:31
@dantaik dantaik changed the title feat(protocol: improve DelegateOwner to have an optional L2 admin feat(protocol): improve DelegateOwner to have an optional L2 admin May 31, 2024
Copy link

openzeppelin-code bot commented May 31, 2024

feat(protocol): improve DelegateOwner to have an optional L2 admin

Generated at commit: 282d6716cf02b74caa2ceb01b696fd4fd8c1b9a1

🚨 Report Summary

Severity Level Results
Contracts Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
2
2
0
8
42
54
Dependencies Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0

For more details view the full report in OpenZeppelin Code Inspector

@dantaik dantaik marked this pull request as draft June 3, 2024 15:01
@dantaik dantaik marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2024 07:58
@dantaik dantaik added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 1c59e8c Jun 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@dantaik dantaik deleted the improve_delegate_owner branch June 18, 2024 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants