Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@apply alternative / abandoned spec #627

Closed
Vorror opened this issue Jan 27, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

@apply alternative / abandoned spec #627

Vorror opened this issue Jan 27, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Vorror
Copy link

Vorror commented Jan 27, 2019

With @apply being an abandoned specification it's unlikely any syntax parsers, linters, formatters, libraries, etc will support it going forward.

Will tailwind be moving to something else? Maybe something that also works with scss?

@adamwathan
Copy link
Member

We won't be switching it unless the spec comes back and makes our version make no sense 👍🏻 We use a lot of other at-rules that aren't real (@screen, @tailwind, @variants, @responsive) so even if we changed this one you'd still have the same syntax/linter issues for those. Hopefully one day we can invest in creating our own syntax files for popular editors, but in the mean time I always recommend people use PostCSS syntax highlighting and it seems to work fine.

Maybe something that also works with scss?

Not sure what you mean here as it already works fine with SCSS. Any particular problem you are hitting?

Closing as not an issue but happy to continue the discussion.

@texastoland
Copy link

I didn't even realize until tonight it was abandoned (along with nesting). I'm not sure the ship has sailed yet. For documentation's sake there is an open issues looking for someone to pick it back up in w3c/csswg-drafts#1047.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants