-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Have the ability to edit .pkg.slp files while keeping embedded images and metadata #1018
Comments
Incorrect analysis below, see future comments for actual problem.
|
Hi @roomrys -When you use Given this, why not allow the Cheers, A |
Hi @auesro, You are correct; I overlooked the extension earlier - these are indeed normal I could speculate more than a few reasons for why you would want to edit the Thanks, P.S. I removed the bug label and added the enhancement label since it is not an error, but a feature we have yet to add. The TODO would be to raise an error or warning message when trying to save the |
Hi @roomrys Thanks for the detailed explanaiton. In our personal case, we are working together with @isabelperezf in the same project. She has labeled more than 1000 frames from 20 different source videos using her computer. Now I wanted to test several different models and parameters (my computer is faster) so I took the Hope it is kind of clear, if not please, let me know! Great job both at the software development and "customer" support front! Cheers, A |
Hi @auesro, Thanks for the detailed description of the use case. As @roomrys outlined above, we do not currently support editing The corrections use case is a tricky one. What's practical would be to be able to edit the skeleton and instances, but not add/remove labeled frames, but we still need to refactor some stuff to deal with the re-saving issue mentioned above. The use case of having multiple people label the same images (without having to keep the videos together) makes a lot of sense and is definitely one which we would like to support. We'll add this to our roadmap, but in the meantime, I'll mention a couple of pieces of functionality that are relevant here:
The latter might be the best workaround for now. If you're interested, let us know and we can try and give you a notebook example showing how to set something like this up. Cheers, Talmo |
Thanks for the input, @talmo, I will consider the options and get back to you |
Bug description
When moving a slp file to another computer, some slp project files require to link each of the videos in the dataset while others do not.
Expected behaviour
Either all or none of the slp projects should require the videos linked in the Videos tab. Or at least to clarify somewhere how we can use the slp file itself to provide those paths.
Actual behaviour
Some slp files ask for the videos to be re-linked while others show the path to the actual slp file for each of the videos originally linked in the Videos tab (see screenshots). This is something specially weird because when I try to use the slp path itself for more than 1 video it shows an error message (see second screenshot).
Your personal set up
Linux-5.4.0-131-generic-x86_64-with-debian-bullseye-sid (Linux Mint 20.2)
SLEAP: 1.2.8
TensorFlow: 2.6.3
Numpy: 1.19.5
Python: 3.7.12
Environment packages
Screenshots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: