You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.
Even unrelated to decorators, it makes sense, and follows the mental model, that if you eval Ex.test.toString() inside a similar lexical context (the body of class Ex, with the same variable bindings in scope) that it should result in a static method.
Intutiively, I like this change. To me, it seems like static is part of the method declaration just as much as async is. I don't think we should put too much stock into the details of a particular version of the spec's grammar when making these sorts of decisions.
Static is currently excluded from a method's
toString
:The decorators group would like to include it in the
toString
, since it can't go before the decorators.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: