Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proper multi-material support for semidiscretize #167

Open
termi-official opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Proper multi-material support for semidiscretize #167

termi-official opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@termi-official
Copy link
Owner

Currently semidiscretize does not have good support for subdomains with different physics. Needs to be fixed.

@termi-official
Copy link
Owner Author

For now I think it is better to go down a different road here.

First, we should add multi-material support at material-level, instead of at discretization level. The problem with having the support at discretization level is that it becomes hard to reason programmtically about the resulting function form of the semi-discretization, as no symbolic representation of the problem is available right now.

Second, for problems with different physics is crystalizes out that having different types for each instance is easier to manage than having a single struct which needs to be decomposed.

@termi-official termi-official changed the title Proper subdomain support for semidiscretize Proper multi-material support for semidiscretize Jan 17, 2025
@termi-official termi-official removed their assignment Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant