You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For now I think it is better to go down a different road here.
First, we should add multi-material support at material-level, instead of at discretization level. The problem with having the support at discretization level is that it becomes hard to reason programmtically about the resulting function form of the semi-discretization, as no symbolic representation of the problem is available right now.
Second, for problems with different physics is crystalizes out that having different types for each instance is easier to manage than having a single struct which needs to be decomposed.
termi-official
changed the title
Proper subdomain support for semidiscretize
Proper multi-material support for semidiscretize
Jan 17, 2025
Currently semidiscretize does not have good support for subdomains with different physics. Needs to be fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: