-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
r/subnet: switching over the association
resources
#5801
Conversation
…group_id` fields
This is now managed/tested in the association resource
The broken website Travis is complaining about has been fixed via #5807 - so this should be fine |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This has been released in version 2.0.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.0.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
This PR removes the
network_security_group_id
androute_table_id
fields from theazurerm_subnet
resource in favour of the split-out association resources.It also goes through and updates the tests to confirm that delta updates are correctly handled for these resources - which were previously handled in the route table resource (but needed to be moved to the association resource)
Fixes #3302
Fixes #3749
Fixes #4818