We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
python-tuf gets automatic issues requesting review of new TUF versions (theupdateframework/python-tuf#1992). That seems useful here.
Seems like it comes from https://github.com/theupdateframework/python-tuf/blob/1efd52c7c403daee9e9f2e1c6d587d349aac147b/.github/workflows/specification-version.yml
Which could be abstracted out into a theupdateframework/specification-bump action.
theupdateframework/specification-bump
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That would be great. We could implement the checking of a release and comparing it to an input value in a reusable workflow (within the specification repository?) and each TUF implementation that cares to can reuse the workflow and will only need to figure out how to pass the implemented version of the specification https://github.com/theupdateframework/python-tuf/blob/1efd52c7c403daee9e9f2e1c6d587d349aac147b/.github/workflows/specification-version.yml#L22-L26
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sounds great 👍 I can draft a PR for stripping that into a reusable workflow and apply the necessary patches to current TUF implementations.
rdimitrov
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
python-tuf gets automatic issues requesting review of new TUF versions (theupdateframework/python-tuf#1992). That seems useful here.
Seems like it comes from https://github.com/theupdateframework/python-tuf/blob/1efd52c7c403daee9e9f2e1c6d587d349aac147b/.github/workflows/specification-version.yml
Which could be abstracted out into a
theupdateframework/specification-bump
action.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: