Important
Elastic docs migration from asciidoc to Markdown is ongoing for 9.0.
Elasticians can reach out in #docs
or #es-docs
on Slack if you have questions.
Tip
If you need to update the 8.x
docs, you'll have to use the old asciidoc
system. Refer to the 8.x
README for more information.
This is a guide for writing, editing, and building the Elasticsearch docs.
As of 9.0.0, the Elasticsearch docs have been redistributed as part of the Elastic docs migration, with the aim of telling a more cohesive story across Elastic products, features, and tools.
Docs live in three places:
- Reference content lives in this repo. This covers low-level stuff like settings and configuration information that is tightly coupled to code.
- 👩🏽💻 Engineers own the bulk of this content.
- API reference docs live in the Elasticsearch specification
- This is where you need to update API docs published in the new API docs system
- 👩🏽💻 Engineers own this content.
- Narrative, overview, and conceptual content mostly lives in the
docs-content
repo.
- ✍🏼 Tech writers own the bulk of this content.
Once the docs are published, you'll be able to choose the Edit this page
option to find the source file in the appropriate GitHub repo.
In the meantime, grep around in the Elasticsearch or docs-content
repos to identify the source file.
For 9.0.0+, all (ex-API reference) docs are written in Elastic docs V3 Markdown syntax and stored in .md
files.
You can:
- Build the docs locally
- Make single-page edits using the GitHub UI
For open PRs, a GitHub action generates a live preview of any docs changes. If the check runs successfully, you can find the preview at:
https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/<PR-NUMBER>/reference/
To re-run CI checks, an Elastic employee can select the Re-run this job
option in the GitHub Actions tab.
Tip
As of 9.0.0, we are currently only publishing from the main
branch.
This means that backporting is currently not necessary for 9.0+ Elasticsearch docs.
However, if you need to update the 8.x
docs, you'll have to use the old asciidoc
system. Refer to the 8.x
README for more information.
Note
If you need to make changes to 9.x docs and 8.x docs, you'll need to use two different workflows:
- For
9.x
docs, create a PR using the new Markdown system against themain
branch. - For
8.x
docs, create a PR using the old AsciiDoc system against the8.x
branch and backport the changes to any other8.x
branches needed.
Important
Snippet testing has been temporarily disabled for Elasticsearch docs. This is a WIP and should be re-enabled soon for the new Markdown docs.
Snippets in console
syntax are automatically tested by the command ./gradlew -pdocs check
. To test just the docs from a single page, use e.g. ./gradlew -pdocs yamlRestTest --tests "*rollover*"
.
By default each console
snippet runs as its own isolated test. You can manipulate the test execution in the following ways:
-
% TEST
: Explicitly marks a snippet as a test. Snippets marked this way are tests even if they don't have```console
but usually% TEST
is used for its modifiers:% TEST[s/foo/bar/]
: Replacefoo
withbar
in the generated test. This should be used sparingly because it makes the snippet "lie". Sometimes, though, you can use it to make the snippet more clear. Keep in mind that if there are multiple substitutions then they are applied in the order that they are defined.% TEST[catch:foo]
: Used to expect errors in the requests. Replacefoo
withrequest
to expect a 400 error, for example. If the snippet contains multiple requests then only the last request will expect the error.% TEST[continued]
: Continue the test started in the last snippet. Between tests the nodes are cleaned: indexes are removed, etc. This prevents that from happening between snippets because the two snippets are a single test. This is most useful when you have text and snippets that work together to tell the story of some use case because it merges the snippets (and thus the use case) into one big test.- You can't use
% TEST[continued]
immediately after% TESTSETUP
or// TEARDOWN
.
- You can't use
% TEST[skip:reason]
: Skip this test. Replacereason
with the actual reason to skip the test. Snippets without% TEST
or// CONSOLE
aren't considered tests anyway but this is useful for explicitly documenting the reason why the test shouldn't be run.% TEST[setup:name]
: Run some setup code before running the snippet. This is useful for creating and populating indexes used in the snippet. Thename
is split on,
and looked up in thesetups
defined indocs/build.gradle
. See% TESTSETUP
below for a similar feature.% TEST[teardown:name]
: Run some teardown code after the snippet. This is useful for performing hidden cleanup, such as deleting index templates. Thename
is split on,
and looked up in theteardowns
defined indocs/build.gradle
. See% TESTSETUP
below for a similar feature.% TEST[warning:some warning]
: Expect the response to include aWarning
header. If the response doesn't include aWarning
header with the exact text then the test fails. If the response includesWarning
headers that aren't expected then the test fails.
-
```console-result
: Matches this snippet against the body of the response of the last test. If the response is JSON then order is ignored. If you add% TEST[continued]
to the snippet after```console-result
it will continue in the same test, allowing you to interleave requests with responses to check. -
% TESTRESPONSE
: Explicitly marks a snippet as a test response even without```console-result
. Similarly to% TEST
this is mostly used for its modifiers.- You can't use
```console-result
immediately after% TESTSETUP
. Instead, consider using% TEST[continued]
or rearrange your snippets.
[!NOTE]
Previously we only used% TESTRESPONSE
instead of```console-result
so you'll see that a lot in older branches but we prefer```console-result
now.% TESTRESPONSE[s/foo/bar/]
: Substitutions. See% TEST[s/foo/bar]
for how it works. These are much more common than% TEST[s/foo/bar]
because they are useful for eliding portions of the response that are not pertinent to the documentation.- One interesting difference here is that you often want to match against the response from Elasticsearch. To do that you can reference the "body" of the response like this:
% TESTRESPONSE[s/"took": 25/"took": $body.took/]
. Note the$body
string. This says "I don't expect that 25 number in the response, just match against what is in the response." Instead of writing the path into the response after$body
you can write$_path
which "figures out" the path. This is especially useful for making sweeping assertions like "I made up all the numbers in this example, don't compare them" which looks like% TESTRESPONSE[s/\d+/$body.$_path/]
.
- One interesting difference here is that you often want to match against the response from Elasticsearch. To do that you can reference the "body" of the response like this:
% TESTRESPONSE[non_json]
: Add substitutions for testing responses in a format other than JSON. Use this after all other substitutions so it doesn't make other substitutions difficult.% TESTRESPONSE[skip:reason]
: Skip the assertions specified by this response.
- You can't use
-
% TESTSETUP
: Marks this snippet as the "setup" for all other snippets in this file. In order to enhance clarity and simplify understanding for readers, a straightforward approach involves marking the first snippet in the documentation file with the% TESTSETUP
marker. By doing so, it clearly indicates that this particular snippet serves as the setup or preparation step for all subsequent snippets in the file. This helps in explaining the necessary steps that need to be executed before running the examples. Unlike the alternative convention% TEST[setup:name]
, which relies on a setup defined in a separate file, this convention brings the setup directly into the documentation file, making it more self-contained and reducing ambiguity. By adopting this convention, users can easily identify and follow the correct sequence of steps to ensure that the examples provided in the documentation work as intended. -
// TEARDOWN
: Ends and cleans up a test series started with% TESTSETUP
or% TEST[setup:name]
. You can use// TEARDOWN
to set up multiple tests in the same file. -
// NOTCONSOLE
: Marks this snippet as neither// CONSOLE
nor% TESTRESPONSE
, excluding it from the list of unconverted snippets. We should only use this for snippets that are JSON but are not responses or requests.
In addition to the standard CONSOLE syntax these snippets can contain blocks of yaml surrounded by markers like this:
startyaml
- compare_analyzers: {index: thai_example, first: thai, second: rebuilt_thai}
endyaml
This allows slightly more expressive testing of the snippets. Since that syntax is not supported by ```console
the usual way to incorporate it is with a % TEST[s//]
marker like this:
% TEST[s/\n$/\nstartyaml\n - compare_analyzers: {index: thai_example, first: thai, second: rebuilt_thai}\nendyaml\n/]
Any place you can use json you can use elements like $body.path.to.thing
which is replaced on the fly with the contents of the thing at path.to.thing
in the last response.