diff --git a/db/migration/migration_test.go b/db/migration/migration_test.go
index b2b783fdc..dc7b43eb4 100644
--- a/db/migration/migration_test.go
+++ b/db/migration/migration_test.go
@@ -10,6 +10,41 @@ import (
 	assert "github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 )
 
+// This tests is coming from this PR
+// https://github.com/tinkerbell/tink/pull/466
+//
+// We didn't fully understood how
+// the migration library sorts migration before having to troubleshoot
+// that PR. Even if we declare them in order as part of the GetMigrations
+// function the library still applies quick sort on the migration ID to
+// stay concurrency safe
+//
+// https://github.com/rubenv/sql-migrate/blob/011dc47c6043b25483490739b61cabbc5da7ee9a/migrate.go#L216
+//
+// In order to improve the visibility and to acknowledge that the way we
+// append migrations to GetMigrations is the same we get after the sorting
+// we wrote this tests.
+// A possible solution is to write our own MigrationSet who won't do the
+// ordering. In the meantime I (gianarb) will start a conversation with library
+// maintainer to figure out how we can improve this.
+func TestMigrationsAreOrderendInTheWayWeDeclaredThem(t *testing.T) {
+	declaredMigration := GetMigrations().Migrations
+	orderedMigration, err := GetMigrations().FindMigrations()
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	if len(declaredMigration) != len(orderedMigration) {
+		t.Error("Migrations do not have the same number of elements. This should never happen.")
+	}
+
+	for ii, dm := range declaredMigration {
+		if dm.Id != orderedMigration[ii].Id {
+			t.Errorf("Expected migration \"%s\" but got \"%s\"", dm.Id, orderedMigration[ii].Id)
+		}
+	}
+
+}
+
 func TestMigrationFuncNamesMatchIDs(t *testing.T) {
 	timestamps := map[string]bool{}
 	for _, m := range migrations {