Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup v2.0 #146

Closed
gauravgahlot opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Setup v2.0 #146

gauravgahlot opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/setup Issue related to tinkerbell setup kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now.

Comments

@gauravgahlot
Copy link
Contributor

## document what each section does (in detail)

# prereqs
	- docker 
	- docker-compose 
	- curl
	- git

# generate 'envrc'

# download osie (s3)
	- inputs from Manny about trimmed osie.tar

# basic network config
	- distro specific
		- minimal distro support
		- list supported distros in docs
	- skip (configure yourself)
		- manual setup docs
	
# generate certs

# registry setup
	- docker daemon config
	- push worker and fluentbit images

# docker-compose up
	- depends_on 
	- health_checks


@gauravgahlot gauravgahlot added the area/setup Issue related to tinkerbell setup label Jun 3, 2020
@gauravgahlot gauravgahlot added priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Jun 3, 2020
@grahamc
Copy link
Contributor

grahamc commented Jun 3, 2020

WIP PR at #147

@alexellis
Copy link
Contributor

@gauravgahlot thanks for the ping on Slack

I'd like to see the download verified by SHA before unpacking.

There should be a way to bring the compose back up without having to run setup.sh ideally, right now it depends on ENV-vars captured during setup.sh - so could they be written into an env file?

Why is ifupdown used if Netplan is now the standard on Ubuntu and similar systems? Would it make sense to use that instead?

I believe I've re-generated the certs at least once or twice and then had a corrupted installation. I've also seen several people get stuck with restarting their provisioner machine, after one week powered-down, I couldn't reconcile my setup.

@gauravgahlot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@grahamc @mrmrcoleman I think we can close it now.

@gauravgahlot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this one. New issues may be created in future.

@alexellis
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, have you moved over to Netplan when installing on Ubuntu LTS (my main concern)?

@gauravgahlot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/setup Issue related to tinkerbell setup kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants