Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IgnoreMap should be ignored when listing rome missing dependencies #107

Closed
c0diq opened this issue Dec 19, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

IgnoreMap should be ignored when listing rome missing dependencies #107

c0diq opened this issue Dec 19, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@c0diq
Copy link

c0diq commented Dec 19, 2017

Enhancement Suggestion

When using rome list --missing, the projects listed under [IgnoreMap] are skipped thus it is not possible to use it to "checkout" or "bootstrap" dependencies that are not stored in Rome. For example:
"rome list --missing --platform ios | awk '{print $1}' | xargs carthage bootstrap --platform ios --cache-builds"

**Current and suggested behavior**

Add a parameter to allow returning ignored projects from "rome list"
@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner

tmspzz commented Dec 19, 2017

Implemented in #108

please try the binary at https://github.com/blender/Rome/releases/tag/v0.13.1.34

Let me know if it works as expected.

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner

tmspzz commented Jan 3, 2018

@c0diq Do you have any feedback on the build?

@c0diq
Copy link
Author

c0diq commented Jan 5, 2018

Works great. Thank you!

@c0diq
Copy link
Author

c0diq commented Jan 5, 2018

Unrelated but is it possible you use a semantic version with only 3 digits? Using 4 digits such as 0.13.1.34 breaks semantic versioning parsing tools that expect only 3. Typically the 3rd one is the build number (your 34).

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner

tmspzz commented Jan 5, 2018

@c0diq Usually Haskell packaged have 4 number as version (no idea why).

major.minor.patch.build is the scheme I use. Semantic version parsing should not assume 3 numbers but rather major.minor.patch._whatever_.

Are you suggesting changing the output of --version ?

@tmspzz
Copy link
Owner

tmspzz commented Jan 17, 2018

@c0diq i'll close this issue. Please open another one for the version number.

@tmspzz tmspzz closed this as completed Jan 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants