-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add one more type a tuple with parens. Pretty please. #213
Comments
More info about the parser I wrote. http://rick-hightower.blogspot.com/2014/04/groovy-and-boon-provide-fastest-json.html I also wrote a JSON loose, and an ASCII PLIST (Json-ish) parser. The loose format allows comments. /* */, // and #. It is about 4x faster than common variants. (I was aiming for parity and I overshot). The idea of the JSON loose and the PLIST is very similar to TOML. PLIST seemed more inline. I did not know about TOML. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_list TOML and PLIST are similar. TOML looks like ASCII PLIST and Windows INI files had a baby. |
This looks like a duplicate of #154. |
I am closing this because it's a dupe of #154. |
Add to table, int, float, date, one more type... tuple.
You have table which is a k/v map.
You have array which all items have to be on type.
Add a list.
(1, "foo", 1979-05-27T07:32:00Z)
Sometimes things make sense in tuples. Disparate types are good for expressing many concepts.
Boon will have the 6th TOML implementation for Java.
I am writing a lot of config files, and I find JSON aggravating.
And I agree YAML has jumped the shark.
Off topic:
Boon will have tuple.
I tend to marshal JSON arrays instead of JSON objects to reduce the footprint of the JSON feed, which matters when you have a 10,000,000 user app.
I can see using toml in places where I normally might use JSON, not just config.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: