You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fundamentally this is a question of wehther TOML documents should be treated as secure to parse or not. In practical terms: in languages like Ruby with a Symbol class which is insecure to create from arbitrary strings, should keys become Symbols or Strings?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's designed to be a configuration format, but this is a false dichotomy in my opinion. I think JSON is a better choice. Comments can and should be stored externally.
It's more of a configuration format in my mind. That's what I really want it for. I leave it to the implementor to decide what the best treatment of keys is.
Fundamentally this is a question of wehther TOML documents should be treated as secure to parse or not. In practical terms: in languages like Ruby with a Symbol class which is insecure to create from arbitrary strings, should keys become Symbols or Strings?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: