You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are a few features from QCoDeS' experiment functions that I'd like to see in labcore.
Getting units, names, etc. for variables from instrument driver functions. For example, our M5180 VNA's driver has a function M5180.s21 which can be called to get scattering parameters, or various attributes can be examined to get the frequency axis, units, and so on. QCoDeS' register_parameter(M5180.s21) gets all that data automatically. The labcore way of doing this is very manual by comparison:
Saving station snapshot to HDF5 file. Every experiment in QCoDeS' has a station defined, which is a collection of instruments, the parameters of all of which are saved alongside the data. This makes it easy to go back to an experiment later and check something like the VNA's power level.
I'm just getting started with labcore, so possibly these capabilities already exist and I haven't found them. If not, I can work on it. I'm not sure what the best way to handle the first part is and would appreciate suggestions, but the second part I believe could be done by having run_and_save_sweep accept a station argument.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
And now I see that qcodes parameters as actions for a Sweep is listed in the todo, covering my first point. Sorry for the duplication. I'll leave this issue open in case I wind up working on that.
There are a few features from QCoDeS' experiment functions that I'd like to see in labcore.
M5180.s21
which can be called to get scattering parameters, or various attributes can be examined to get the frequency axis, units, and so on. QCoDeS'register_parameter(M5180.s21)
gets all that data automatically. The labcore way of doing this is very manual by comparison:I'm just getting started with labcore, so possibly these capabilities already exist and I haven't found them. If not, I can work on it. I'm not sure what the best way to handle the first part is and would appreciate suggestions, but the second part I believe could be done by having run_and_save_sweep accept a station argument.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: