SharePoint Notes.md

For your scenario involving instructional developers creating and reviewing course content, SharePoint and Microsoft Teams can work together effectively to streamline the workflow. Here's a breakdown of best practices for organizing and storing files in SharePoint, and how Microsoft Teams could complement it:

Best Practices for SharePoint File Organization Plan a Logical Folder Structure

Create libraries or folders based on stages of development, such as: Development Review Final Content Use subfolders or metadata to distinguish courses, subjects, or teams.

Leverage Metadata

Use SharePoint's metadata features to categorize content (e.g., course name, status, owner). This avoids over-reliance on complex folder structures and improves searchability. Set Permissions by Stage

Restrict permissions for each stage to ensure only the right people can access or edit files. For instance: Developers access the Development folder. Reviewers access the Review folder. Only finalized files are accessible to instructors in the Final Content folder. Version Control

Enable version history to track changes and prevent accidental overwrites. This is particularly useful during the Review stage. Use Document Libraries

Organize content in separate document libraries for better scalability and easier management. For example: A library for Drafts A library for Reviewed Content A library for Published Content Implement a Naming Convention

Use standardized file names to indicate the course, date, or version. For example: CourseName_Development_v1.0.docx CourseName_Review_v1.1.docx CourseName_Final_v2.0.docx Share Links, Not Files

Encourage team members to share links to documents rather than downloading and emailing files to ensure everyone accesses the latest version. Enable Notifications

Use alerts or workflows to notify reviewers when files are ready for review or instructors when new content is published. How Microsoft Teams Can Help While SharePoint can handle your needs independently, Microsoft Teams enhances collaboration:

Integrated Communication

Use Teams for chat, calls, and meetings directly tied to specific courses or projects. For example, create a Team for a specific course development project. File Access in Context

Teams integrates directly with SharePoint. You can add tabs in Teams channels that link to specific SharePoint libraries or folders for quick access to relevant files. Simplified Collaboration

Files uploaded to a Teams channel are stored in the associated SharePoint library. Teams makes it easier to co-author and review documents in real time. Task Management with Planner

Use Planner or To-Do within Teams to assign tasks for development and review phases, ensuring everyone knows their responsibilities. Notifications

Teams can notify members about file changes or comments, improving responsiveness. Recommended Workflow Using Both Development Phase

Store drafts in the Development folder in SharePoint. Collaborate in real-time through Teams meetings and chat. Assign tasks in Teams Planner for content development. Review Phase

Move files to the Review folder/library in SharePoint. Use Teams to discuss feedback and comments on specific files. Leverage SharePoint version history for tracking changes. Final Posting

Upload completed files to the Final Content folder in SharePoint. Create a Read-Only link for instructors to download the content. Key Considerations Complexity of Teams Integration: If you have multiple teams working on various projects, Teams can quickly become cluttered without a clear structure. Instructor Access: If instructors only need to download content, a well-structured SharePoint library with proper permissions might suffice without involving Teams. Training: Ensure team members are trained on using SharePoint features like metadata, versioning, and Teams collaboration. In conclusion, SharePoint is sufficient for file storage and organization, but pairing it with Microsoft Teams can enhance communication, collaboration, and task management. If your teams are already familiar with Teams, integrating it into your workflow can provide significant advantage

######## What are the pros and cons of selling up a folder hierarchy vs. documents in a list with views based on document attributes or categories as columns? Both a folder hierarchy and using document attributes (metadata) with views in SharePoint have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The choice depends on the nature of your content, the needs of your team, and the complexity of your workflows. Here's a comparison:

---

Folder Hierarchy

Pros

1. Familiar Structure

   • Mimics traditional file systems, making it intuitive for users accustomed to working with folders.

2. Simple Setup

   • Easy to create and organize without requiring additional configuration or training.

3. Clear Visual Grouping

   • Provides a clear, hierarchical organization for files (e.g., by course, development phase).

4. Segregated Permissions

   • Permissions can be easily applied at the folder level to control access to specific sections.

Cons

1. Limited Scalability

   • As the number of files and folders grows, navigation becomes cumbersome.

2. Redundancy Issues

   • Files may need to be duplicated across folders if they belong to multiple categories, leading to inconsistencies.

3. Search Challenges

   • Users may struggle to find files if they don’t know the exact folder location.

4. Version History Hidden

   • Version history and other SharePoint features are harder to surface in a folder structure.

---

Documents with Attributes (Metadata)

Pros

1. Improved Searchability

   • Metadata makes it easier to filter and search for files using keywords, categories, or views.

2. Dynamic Organization

   • Files can be grouped, filtered, or sorted differently without moving them, providing flexibility for different teams.

3. Scalability

   • The structure remains efficient regardless of the number of files since views dynamically organize content.

4. No Redundancy

   • A single file can belong to multiple categories or be part of various views without duplication.

5. Enhanced Automation

   • Metadata works well with workflows, automated tagging, and notifications in SharePoint.

Cons

1. Initial Setup Effort

   • Setting up columns, views, and training users to apply metadata correctly takes time and effort.

2. User Training

   • Team members may find it less intuitive, requiring education on tagging files and using views.

3. Potential for Misclassification

   • If metadata isn’t applied consistently, files may become harder to organize and retrieve.

4. Permissions Complexity

   • Managing permissions can be less straightforward, as metadata does not inherently segregate access.

---

Effective file naming standards are crucial for organization, searchability, and long-term maintainability. Here are best practices, broken down by key considerations:

1. Clarity and Consistency:

• Descriptive Names: File names should clearly indicate the file's content. Avoid vague names like "Document1.docx" or "Image.jpg".

• Consistent Format: Adopt a consistent format for all files. This makes it easier to scan and understand at a glance. Examples of formats:

  • YYYYMMDD_Project Name_Description.filetype (e.g., 20241028_MarketingCampaign_Report.pdf)
  • Project Name_Description_YYYYMMDD.filetype (e.g., MarketingCampaign_Report_20241028.pdf)
  • ProjectName_vX_Description.filetype (e.g., WebsiteDesign_v2_HomepageMockup.psd) (useful for version control)

• Use Underscores (_), not Spaces: Spaces can cause problems in some systems and file paths. Underscores are universally accepted.

• Avoid Special Characters: Stick to alphanumeric characters (A-Z, a-z, 0-9) and underscores. Avoid symbols like !@#$%^&*() etc., as these can be problematic in different software and operating systems.

• Keep it Concise: While descriptive, aim for brevity to avoid excessively long file names.

2. Version Control:

• Version Numbering: For documents that undergo multiple revisions, include a version number in the file name. Common methods:

  • v1, v2, v3...
  • Version 1, Version 2, Version 3...
  • 1.0, 1.1, 2.0... (for more granular versioning)

• Date Stamping: Include the date of the last modification, ensuring you know which version is the most current.

3. Context and Metadata:

• Project or Course Codes: If applicable, include project or course codes to easily identify the file's context.
• Author or Contributor: Consider including the author's initials or a short identifier.
• Document Type: The file extension typically indicates the type, but explicitly stating it in the filename can sometimes be beneficial for clarity (especially when dealing with many files).

4. File Extensions:

• Always Use Correct Extensions: Ensure that the file extension accurately reflects the file type (.docx, .pdf, .xlsx, .jpg, etc.).

Examples of Good File Naming Conventions:

• 20241028_MarketingReport_Q3_Final.pdf
• ProjectAlpha_v3_DesignSpecs_20241027.docx
• TrainingModule_IntroToSoftware_v1.pptx
• ClientXYZ_Proposal_20241028_JM.pdf (JM = Author's Initials)

Examples of Poor File Naming Conventions:

• report.doc
• stuff.pdf
• marketing stuff.docx
• document123.xlsx

Choosing a Standard:

Select a standard that works for your organization and consistently enforce it across all teams. Document your chosen standard and share it with everyone. Consider using a template for file names to enforce consistency. This will make a huge difference in long-term maintainability and the overall efficiency of your workflow.

When to Use Folder Hierarchies

• Teams are accustomed to a folder structure and find it intuitive.
• You have a relatively small, static set of documents.
• The same document rarely fits into multiple categories.
• There’s a need to segregate access easily based on folders.

---

When to Use Metadata with Views

• You anticipate a large volume of documents with complex relationships.
• Files need to be organized dynamically based on different criteria (e.g., course type, status, author).
• Your team is comfortable with tagging documents and using advanced search or filtering.
• You want to take advantage of SharePoint’s advanced features, such as workflows and automated processes.

---

Best of Both Worlds: Combining Both Approaches

You can combine folders and metadata to leverage the strengths of both approaches. For example:

1. Use high-level folders for major categories (e.g., Course Development, Reviews, Final Content).
2. Use metadata within each folder to further organize and filter files (e.g., Course Name, Phase, Date, Reviewer).

This hybrid approach balances familiarity with the power of metadata and ensures scalability as your needs grow.

The choice between a folder hierarchy and a document library with views in SharePoint depends on your specific needs and how your users work. Both have pros and cons:

Folder Hierarchy (Traditional File System Approach):

Pros:

• Intuitive and Familiar: Most users are comfortable navigating folder structures; it mirrors how they typically organize files on their desktops.
• Simple Implementation: Relatively straightforward to set up and understand.
• Visual Organization: Provides a clear visual representation of the organizational structure.
• Offline Access (with limitations): Can be synchronized for offline access, though this might not work optimally with large structures.

Cons:

• Limited Metadata and Search: Reliance on folder names for organization limits search capabilities and metadata tracking. Finding specific files within a large hierarchy can be challenging.
• Version Control Challenges: Managing versions effectively within a folder structure can be difficult and require manual processes. SharePoint's versioning can still be used, but it's not as inherently tied to the organization.
• Redundancy and Inconsistency: Different users may organize files differently, leading to inconsistencies and duplication.
• Scalability Issues: Can become unwieldy and difficult to navigate as the number of files and folders grows.

Document Library with Views:

Pros:

• Powerful Search and Filtering: Metadata columns enable robust search and filtering based on various attributes (author, date, keywords, etc.), making it easy to find specific documents.
• Centralized Metadata Management: Allows for consistent metadata tagging and improves discoverability.
• Version Control: SharePoint's version control features integrate seamlessly, making it easy to track and manage different versions of documents.
• Scalability: Handles a large number of documents effectively without significant performance degradation.
• Flexibility: Views allow for customized presentations of the same data, tailoring the user experience to different needs.

Cons:

• Steeper Learning Curve: Users may need some training to effectively utilize views and metadata.
• Less Intuitive for Some: The lack of a visual hierarchy can be less intuitive for users accustomed to folder structures.
• Requires Careful Planning: Requires careful upfront planning to define appropriate metadata columns and views to support efficient navigation and searching.

Which is better?

• Choose a folder hierarchy if: You have a relatively small number of documents, a simple organizational structure, and your users are comfortable with a traditional file system approach. Prioritize simplicity over advanced features.

• Choose a document library with views if: You have a large number of documents, require robust search and filtering capabilities, need strong version control, and value consistent metadata management. Prioritize advanced features and scalability.

For your instructional design scenario, a document library with views is generally recommended. You can leverage metadata columns (Course Name, Course Status, Content Type, Review Stage, etc.) to create powerful views tailored to different user roles (developers, reviewers, instructors). This enables efficient searching, tracking of different versions, and streamlined access control. Using folders within the document library might still be useful for broad categorization, but relying solely on folder structure for organization would quickly become cumbersome.