Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support for travis-pro #94

Open
licarth opened this issue Feb 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

support for travis-pro #94

licarth opened this issue Feb 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@licarth
Copy link

licarth commented Feb 16, 2016

Currently this plugin only supports travis-ci, would be nice if it supported travis-pro, and probably not too big of a change.

@v4ngelo
Copy link

v4ngelo commented May 10, 2016

I was able to fix this problem with the following configuration. Branch, committer info and commit messages seem to be correct:

<plugin> <groupId>org.eluder.coveralls</groupId> <artifactId>coveralls-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>4.1.0</version> <configuration> <repoToken>${env.coveralls_repo_token}</repoToken> <serviceName>travis-pro</serviceName> </configuration> </plugin>

@trautonen
Copy link
Owner

I guess Travis Pro works like pretty much the same way as any private CI would work with the plugin. This means that you have to explicitly provide repoToken like @v4ngelo said.

If someone creates a pull request or could tell if there's way to configure Travis Pro automatically, I'm happy to do that.

@jgangemi
Copy link

jgangemi commented May 4, 2018

i just encountered this myself and i'm not sure it's possible to auto-configure the pro account which is potentially going to be a larger issue now that all open source projects are being migrated over.

i think @v4ngelo has the best approach right now, the token just needs to be encrypted w the travis client. make sure you specify --pro otherwise the wrong api endpoints are used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants