Consider adding solc assembler output in /build

[rocky]

• [x ] I've asked for help in the Truffle Gitter before filing this issue.

---

Issue

For various analysis tools it may be helpful to look at the assembler output of solc. Could this be done as a configuration switch, if not always?

I also note that -asm seems to give more information than -asm-json, but asm-json has interesting detail on its own.

[stale]

Thank you for raising this issue! It has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you would like to keep this issue open, please respond with information about the current state of this problem.

[eggplantzzz]

Not stale

[stale]

Thanks for your response! This issue is no longer considered stale and someone from the Truffle team will try to respond as soon as they can.

[rocky]

Actually, I think this is part of a bigger discussion of what should go into the the build/contracts JSON, and library routines involved there.

I don't think solving this as an independant thing is as important as the discussion of what should go in there.

I am hoping that by working with folks in integrating Mythril into the currently developing plugin architecture we can resolve this as well as other things.

[stale]

Thank you for raising this issue! It has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you would like to keep this issue open, please respond with information about the current state of this problem.

[gnidan]

not stale

[stale]

Thanks for your response! This issue is no longer considered stale and someone from the Truffle team will try to respond as soon as they can.

[rocky]

Is this related to this and indirectly #1645 ?

[gnidan]

Could be related to the stuff in artifact-updates, but I think it's separate from #1645.

The work here is just adding to the artifacts. Should be fine.