Add code coverage as part of truffle test

[davidmurdoch]

This was a feature requested by an attendee at the TruffleCon workshops.

[stale]

Thank you for raising this issue! It has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you would like to keep this issue open, please respond with information about the current state of this problem.

[stale]

Thanks for your response! This issue is no longer considered stale and someone from the Truffle team will try to respond as soon as they can.

[JoranHonig]

Hi @davidmurdoch, awesome that you are going to add this as a feature. I'm working on a tool that analyzes the quality of unit tests, and it would greatly benefit from this functionality.

What will this functionality look like? Could it be possible to add a machine-readable output format that also contains the specific lines that are executed?

[davidmurdoch]

@JoranHonig I actually won't be the one working on this, I just assigned myself to make the stale bot from being automatically closing the issue. I just forgot to unassign myself.

[stale]

Thank you for raising this issue! It has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you would like to keep this issue open, please respond with information about the current state of this problem.

[stale]

There has been no new activity on this issue since it was marked as stale 7 days ago, so it is being automatically closed. If you'd like help with this or a different problem, please open a new issue. Thanks!

[stale]

Thanks for your response! This issue is no longer considered stale and someone from the Truffle team will try to respond as soon as they can.

[gnidan]

Stalebot you are getting on my nerves