Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add ApplicativeError#ensuring (under another name, smelling as sweet) #1630

Closed
djspiewak opened this issue Apr 24, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Add ApplicativeError#ensuring (under another name, smelling as sweet) #1630

djspiewak opened this issue Apr 24, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
Binary Breaking

Comments

@djspiewak
Copy link
Member

RFC on the naming.

The semantics and implementation of the function can be found here. We're going to remove the concrete implementation from IO after pushing it into the typeclass in cats.
@djspiewak djspiewak mentioned this issue May 12, 2017
Closed
@peterneyens peterneyens mentioned this issue Aug 24, 2017
Merged
@ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

ceedubs commented Mar 25, 2018

I'm going to go ahead and close this out, because I think that in #1662 we decided that this shouldn't exist. @djspiewak feel free to reopen this if I'm mistaken.

@ceedubs ceedubs closed this as completed Mar 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Binary Breaking
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Ported IO#ensuring (and renamed to avoid mass confusion) djspiewak/cats
3 participants
@djspiewak @kailuowang @ceedubs