You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 9, 2022. It is now read-only.
Hello, I'm a web designer and I recently used Google Chrome Developer tools, but I found out, that uBlock adds into almost every webpage I open content like the one below (the marked code line in dev tools). I tried to find out, which list does it make and I've discoverred that it is work of EasyList one (concretely this: EasyList (adblockplus.org): 0 použito z celkových 57 869). See the example:
You probably ask something like: What's wrong with that?
It adds this content as an last child of the body or head and alternating, once body, another time head. Why?
It shows even on webpage without any add at all as you can see in the picture
CSS selectors like E:nth-last-child(n) could be messed up
[href^="http://www.face"] and [href^="http://www.link"] are just too much specific
These points doesn't look like good behavior. That's why I openned this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dvorapa
changed the title
EasyList adds hidden content into all webpages
EasyList adds unexpected content into all webpages
Jun 19, 2015
Hello, I'm a web designer and I recently used Google Chrome Developer tools, but I found out, that uBlock adds into almost every webpage I open content like the one below (the marked code line in dev tools). I tried to find out, which list does it make and I've discoverred that it is work of EasyList one (concretely this:
EasyList (adblockplus.org): 0 použito z celkových 57 869
). See the example:You probably ask something like:
What's wrong with that?
body
orhead
and alternating, once body, another time head. Why?E:nth-last-child(n)
could be messed up[href^="http://www.face"]
and[href^="http://www.link"]
are just too much specificThese points doesn't look like good behavior. That's why I openned this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: