Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
not on Windows, but so far the best performance i've seen on Linux was with using the obvious show-stopper is, that currently the Gem builds for Windows do not include the so not an answer at all, just a data point :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hallo, i work a lot with video playback in Gem on old machines. Theese things are depending on your platform, so i see it from linux perspective. In bugreport you were talking about mov or mp4, but thats only containers. My feeling is that they dont have big impact on performance. Inside container you have some codec, and that's more important. One of the most popupar is mjpeg. Its very fast also if you need to access your frames in random order. But the file will be a bit big, so you have to guard the data rate, if your storage is fast enough. pix_film and pix_movie are decoding video in separate thread, so i was often cutting video in 4 quarters and playing them synchrous with four pix_movie or pix_film objects to a framebuffer, so i can use it as one texture. This way you can make better use of your multicore processor. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
hi. I have been suffering the video playback problem on Windows since many years ago. (please see #262 ). if you are Windows users, and having no problem for playing video with
pix_film
orpix_movie
, please let me know your video format and encoding settings. (or also, let me know if you have a same problem) many thanks.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions