You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From source: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.05555.pdf
"Note that β = 0 corresponds to
no re-weighting and β → 1 corresponds to re-weighing by
inverse class frequency"
It looks like they are using binary CE here to determine which class needs to be scaled appropriately based on the number of effective samples. So one class will be a 1, while the rest are 0s.
Hi, Inside the CBloss you are using binary cross-entropy, so why not using cross-entropy ? Could you explain? Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: