Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal] Remove Question object #216

Closed
jasnell opened this issue Oct 20, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

[Proposal] Remove Question object #216

jasnell opened this issue Oct 20, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@jasnell
Copy link
Collaborator

jasnell commented Oct 20, 2015

The Question object can likely be better handled via an extension.

@cwebber
Copy link
Collaborator

cwebber commented Oct 21, 2015

Probably true. As we discussed on IRC, StatusNet / GNU Social had a polling extension that people liked to use when I was using it. However, I don't think it's critical.

Also, one side effect of when that plugin became introduced was my inbox would flood with poll responses, so remembering minor irritation surrounding that, maybe it's a-ok to remove.

@cwebber
Copy link
Collaborator

cwebber commented Oct 21, 2015

What timing! Twitter is now going to add poll support right as we're considering removing it. :)

@dissolve
Copy link
Contributor

I'm still for removing it, The only user story supporting it has a few -1s and several 0's

@cwebber just because one silo supports something, doesn't mean its something we need to support other than as an extension.

@jasnell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jasnell commented Oct 26, 2015

I've received feedback that there are implementers interested in using Question. Given that, I'm going to withdraw this proposal.

@jasnell jasnell closed this as completed Oct 26, 2015
@tantek
Copy link
Member

tantek commented Nov 5, 2015

Which implementations? Can we cite/document this publicly? Ideally have they blogged about it?

Also, "implementers interested in using Question" is a good justification for an extension rather than keeping it in the spec.

Better to drop it and make those implementers speak up publicly on IRC / email / here in the issue.

@jasnell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jasnell commented Nov 5, 2015

Feel free to open your own issue proposing that it be dropped. I'll make sure that all open proposal issues are suggested for the next call agenda. As for implementers, here's one in particular: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Oct/0191.html

Based on discussions with members of the WG who have voiced intent to implement AS2 and Question, I'm -1 on dropping it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants