Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Broken link to Content module from WCAG Understanding doc [triage] #230

Open
matatk opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Broken link to Content module from WCAG Understanding doc [triage] #230

matatk opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@matatk
Copy link
Contributor

matatk commented Nov 7, 2022

Thanks to @mbeganyi for mentioning this. The last para of the "intent" section of https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/identify-input-purpose.html mentions the "Personalization Semantics Content Module" and also happens to link to the Editor's Draft that no longer exists (at https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/content/). We'll need to file this on the WCAG repo, but before we do, we should discuss exactly what we think the remedy may be.

@snidersd
Copy link
Member

@matatk @lwolberg I was about to create a new issue in the WCAG GitHub repo and realized we need to discuss this further as a group. The paragraph specifically mentions autocomplete and I'm not finding a good reference. Also, as I was looking in the WAI-Adapt Explainer current usage I found links to adapt-action, adapt-destination,
adapt-purpose, but they all link to the Symbols module.

@snidersd
Copy link
Member

An issue 3315 has been open in the WCAG 2.2 GitHub repo to address the original issue in the WCAG 1.3.5 Understanding document and it includes the issue with incorrect formatting for the code snippets.
Also a new issue #244 has been open for the WAI-Adapt Explainer and Requirements for WAI-Adapt Specification pages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants