Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[css-view-transition-2] Should :active-view-transition() without parameter be a valid syntax #9627

Closed
vmpstr opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
css-view-transitions-2 View Transitions; New feature requests

Comments

@vmpstr
Copy link
Member

vmpstr commented Nov 22, 2023

This came up in discussion of #9546

We currently only allow * or a list as valid parameters. Should we also allow no parameter to mean the same thing as the asterisk?

I don't have a strong preference. My weak preference is to keep requiring a parameter. This seems more consistent with things like :is() and :has() which, AFAIK, do require a parameter. Although, my sense that this is not really a valid precedence.

@fantasai @atanassov

@vmpstr vmpstr added the css-view-transitions-2 View Transitions; New feature requests label Nov 22, 2023
@noamr
Copy link
Collaborator

noamr commented Nov 23, 2023

Duplicate of #9626

@noamr noamr marked this as a duplicate of #9626 Nov 23, 2023
@noamr noamr closed this as completed Nov 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
css-view-transitions-2 View Transitions; New feature requests
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants