Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Devices and Sensors WG - TPAC 2020 agenda #31

Closed
anssiko opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 22 comments
Closed

Devices and Sensors WG - TPAC 2020 agenda #31

anssiko opened this issue Aug 14, 2020 · 22 comments

Comments

@anssiko
Copy link
Member

anssiko commented Aug 14, 2020

This issue is to work out an agenda for the Devices and Sensors WG meeting at TPAC 2020, a virtual event.

Registration

Please register via https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2020/

Logistics

Max 3 hours per day.

See also https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2020/GroupMeetings

Agenda

22 October 2020, 5:00 UTC

23 October 2020, 5:00 UTC

  • Privacy-preserving APIs discussion

Discuss all privacy issues from the use cases point of view: evaluate the use cases and requirements, ensure the APIs limit their functionality and data exposure to the minimum required to fulfill these requirements.
Review that the new API surface provide the knobs required to design privacy-preserving APIs as per modern best practices

Other proposed discussion topics

Minutes

Participants

Some possible participants with timezone breakdown:

EU

US West Coast

US East Coast

APAC

@lknik
Copy link

lknik commented Aug 14, 2020

Any option to make the hour slightly later than 5:00?

@npdoty
Copy link

npdoty commented Aug 14, 2020

I'm on US East Coast time, fwiw. I recognize that there definitely won't be a convenient timezone that works for everyone, but just thought I should correct the data.

@tomayac
Copy link

tomayac commented Aug 27, 2020

I still hear some discussion (1, 2) around system wake lock use cases, also connected to background geotracking. Shall we put this onto the agenda?

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Aug 27, 2020

@tomayac thanks, good proposal. Added to the agenda.

All - more suggestions?

@maryammjd
Copy link

It is going to start at 5 UTC? it is 6 am UK time. That won't work for me due to caring responsibilities. The earliest would be 7 UTC (8 am UK).

I also wanted to suggest for me to have a presentation (15-20 min) on the relationship between sensor data and privacy regulations (gdpr, CCPA). It might not be directly related to the spec, but it will generate some nice discussions. What do you think?

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Sep 2, 2020

@maryammjd, the meeting will end 7 UTC latest on both the days (midnight Pacific), so it sounds like you’re not able to attend in person (err, I mean virtually in person). Feel free to provide any material for the privacy discussion before the meeting.

@toreini
Copy link

toreini commented Sep 4, 2020

Hi Anssi,

I will not be able to attend (same reasons as @maryammjd). I will put my suggestions (and discussions) for privacy and security section. If you require any further discussions or more detail for the unclear parts; I will elaborate.

I plan to attend Machine learning and WoT discussions as well so we will have a chance to talk.

Cheers,
Ehsan

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

I can do most of the UK/EU times, so long as it's mornings (~8am going forward)... that's basically 5pm for me, so anything in the evening is fine.

@nondebug
Copy link

nondebug commented Oct 1, 2020

I'm planning to attend and would like to discuss the proposed WebHID device API (https://wicg.github.io/webhid/), in particular the security and privacy implications of this API.

@cynthia and @roderickc participated in the TAG review and were interested in a more in-depth discussion of risk mitigation.

@cynthia
Copy link
Member

cynthia commented Oct 1, 2020

Current proposed times, luckily enough work fine for me.

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Oct 1, 2020

@nondebug I added WebHID to the privacy discussion. Could you let us know your timezone and availability during the meeting times so we can plan accordingly?

@nondebug
Copy link

nondebug commented Oct 1, 2020

US West Coast, and the proposed times (~5-7 UTC, 22-23 Oct) work fine for me.

@lknik
Copy link

lknik commented Oct 2, 2020

I don't know yet if I can make it 22/23 Oct. Will wait a bit with establishing that.

@roderickc
Copy link

@nondebug I somehow missed the message, but I should be able to attend as well I think. I'm in US West Coast as well.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

If possible, please send out calendar invites once all the times have been established 🙏

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Oct 7, 2020

@xfq will send out the invite to registered participants and observers when he’s back in the home office. (1-7 Oct is a national holiday in PRC aka The Golden Week.)

All - please make sure you have registered via https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2020/

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Sorta off topic: I'm a little confused why Section 3 of the registration form only allows registering for one group (i.e., it uses a radio button)... I'm attending multiple groups that week, but can only click on one? Anyone else find that weird or am I missing something?

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Oct 8, 2020

@marcoscaceres I’ve reported that registration system bug earlier (@dontcallmedom for status). The section “Note for Group Meeting Registrants - Systems limitations” has instructions.

All - on topic, we’re about to lift the WIP label from the agenda so this is a last call for agenda topics, comments.

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented Oct 9, 2020

To be fully prepared for the meeting, I encourage everyone to watch the See you at TPAC! video that contains relevant information for all participants. 😄

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Oct 24, 2020

I just cleaned up the minutes a bit. They should look better now:

@toreini
Copy link

toreini commented Oct 26, 2020

Thanks for the minutes. @anssiko I think what you proposed is interesting. I am open into doing a joint research on that aspect. How about you @maryammjd ?

@roderickc
Copy link

Thanks for the minutes. Unfortunately last minute I couldn't make it due to many meetings (our console launches quite soon..). Let me know if there are particular questions for Sony or if there is a session coming up in the future, which I can try to join.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests