Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HTML-AAM: possible aria mapping for meter #42

Closed
jasonkiss opened this issue Oct 12, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

HTML-AAM: possible aria mapping for meter #42

jasonkiss opened this issue Oct 12, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor

From @cyns on April 23, 2016 21:22

should we map meter to the following aria?

role = progressbar
aria-roledescription = meter
aria-readonly = true
aria-valuemax = max attribute
aria-valuemin = min attribute
aria-valuenow = value attribute
aria-valuetext = localized string representing the result of optimal calculation (we use "good", "fair", "poor")

Copied from original issue: w3c/aria#344

@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

From @cyns on April 23, 2016 21:22

@stevefaulkner @jasonkiss @joanmarie thoughts?

@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

From @stevefaulkner on April 23, 2016 21:47

Looks good to me

On Saturday, 23 April 2016, cyns [email protected] wrote:

@stevefaulkner https://github.com/stevefaulkner @jasonkiss
https://github.com/jasonkiss @joanmarie https://github.com/Joanmarie
thoughts?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
w3c/aria#344 (comment)

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @w3c
http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/

@jasonkiss jasonkiss assigned jasonkiss and unassigned cyns Oct 19, 2016
@LJWatson LJWatson added this to the WD for wide review milestone Jun 17, 2017
@jasonkiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

Duplicates issue #2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants