You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does your specification include an Internationalization Considerations section?
My specification includes an Internationalization Considerations section
When does the review need to be finished?
Ideally by end of feb would be good as we meet on the last monday, but could be any time in March too
What has changed since any previous review?
This is our first run through the process with MathML-Core, which is a specific subset of MathML-3 that represents what browsers have implemented (or need to implement, in a few cases) to integrate it with platform concepts (CSS/DOM IDL, etc).
Please point to the results of your own self-review
@bkardell Can you clarify this request's start date? You put 2024-03-01, but today is 2024-02-12. Is the document ready for review? Or should we wait for 1 March?
Please note that I18N will not be able to complete a review your specification by the end of February, as your text requests.
Sorry, perhaps I've misunderstood the way these are supposed to be written - I interpret this as we are leaving open a whole month for feedback and comment. Dating that in the future as assuming it starts the day I file it seems unrealistic.
It is ready for review when you are, and we'd like to be able to request to transition in April. Is it clear @aphillips ? Can you help me. understand how others interpret the title syntax, because it is on every request so very likely I might have the same mistake in all of my review requests?
aphillips
changed the title
mathml-core 2024-03-01 > 2024-04-01
mathml-core 2024-02-12 > 2024-04-01
Feb 15, 2024
@bkardell Sorry for any confusion. The dates are the starting date and the desired end date. The starting date is usually, but not always, the date you're opening the issue. It's not usually important unless you want us to wait for some publication to come out or some other event, hence my question above. The end date is more important. 1 April is super-clear!
Name of your specification
mathml-core
URL of your specification
https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/WD-mathml-core-20231127/
Does your specification include an Internationalization Considerations section?
When does the review need to be finished?
Ideally by end of feb would be good as we meet on the last monday, but could be any time in March too
What has changed since any previous review?
This is our first run through the process with MathML-Core, which is a specific subset of MathML-3 that represents what browsers have implemented (or need to implement, in a few cases) to integrate it with platform concepts (CSS/DOM IDL, etc).
Please point to the results of your own self-review
w3c/mathml-core#219
Where and how should the i18n WG raise issues?
https://github.com/w3c/mathml-core/issues
Pointer to any explainer for the spec
https://github.com/w3c/mathml-core/blob/main/docs/explainer.md
Other comments
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: