Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mathml-core 2024-02-12 > 2024-04-01 #226

Open
1 task
bkardell opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 task

mathml-core 2024-02-12 > 2024-04-01 #226

bkardell opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
LC Working Draft approaching CR. REVIEW REQUESTED

Comments

@bkardell
Copy link

Name of your specification

mathml-core

URL of your specification

https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/WD-mathml-core-20231127/

Does your specification include an Internationalization Considerations section?

  • My specification includes an Internationalization Considerations section

When does the review need to be finished?

Ideally by end of feb would be good as we meet on the last monday, but could be any time in March too

What has changed since any previous review?

This is our first run through the process with MathML-Core, which is a specific subset of MathML-3 that represents what browsers have implemented (or need to implement, in a few cases) to integrate it with platform concepts (CSS/DOM IDL, etc).

Please point to the results of your own self-review

w3c/mathml-core#219

Where and how should the i18n WG raise issues?

https://github.com/w3c/mathml-core/issues

Pointer to any explainer for the spec

https://github.com/w3c/mathml-core/blob/main/docs/explainer.md

Other comments

No response

@bkardell bkardell added LC Working Draft approaching CR. pending The WG needs to assign a reviewer. REVIEW REQUESTED labels Feb 12, 2024
@aphillips
Copy link
Contributor

aphillips commented Feb 12, 2024

@bkardell Can you clarify this request's start date? You put 2024-03-01, but today is 2024-02-12. Is the document ready for review? Or should we wait for 1 March?

Please note that I18N will not be able to complete a review your specification by the end of February, as your text requests.

@bkardell
Copy link
Author

bkardell commented Feb 13, 2024

Sorry, perhaps I've misunderstood the way these are supposed to be written - I interpret this as we are leaving open a whole month for feedback and comment. Dating that in the future as assuming it starts the day I file it seems unrealistic.

It is ready for review when you are, and we'd like to be able to request to transition in April. Is it clear @aphillips ? Can you help me. understand how others interpret the title syntax, because it is on every request so very likely I might have the same mistake in all of my review requests?

@aphillips aphillips changed the title mathml-core 2024-03-01 > 2024-04-01 mathml-core 2024-02-12 > 2024-04-01 Feb 15, 2024
@aphillips
Copy link
Contributor

@bkardell Sorry for any confusion. The dates are the starting date and the desired end date. The starting date is usually, but not always, the date you're opening the issue. It's not usually important unless you want us to wait for some publication to come out or some other event, hence my question above. The end date is more important. 1 April is super-clear!

Look forward to providing you any feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
LC Working Draft approaching CR. REVIEW REQUESTED
Projects
Status: Awaiting comment resolution
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants