Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Individual techniques pages must list that they are informative/non-normative #4

Closed
cookiecrook opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
WG input/requirements WG participant submitted feedback or requirements for the project

Comments

@cookiecrook
Copy link

Individual techniques pages must list that they are informative/non-normative.

The top level Techniques page says techniques are informative, but the individual techniques documents do not. In a meeting at TPAC 2019 in Fukuoka, then Chair @awkawk acknowledged this as a problem and committed to getting it resolved.

@cookiecrook
Copy link
Author

cookiecrook commented Jun 4, 2020

In addition to listing the non-normative state of the document, I suggest there be language clarifying that the technique listed is one of several potential ways to satisfy the related success criteria. As written, some of these techniques are misleading, and appear to be the only way to satisfy the success criteria.

@hidde hidde added the WG input/requirements WG participant submitted feedback or requirements for the project label Jun 8, 2020
@hidde
Copy link
Member

hidde commented Jun 8, 2020

Thanks for this feedback! I've updated the requirements analysis in #6 to reflect your comment, and we will ensure that it is clear that Techniques are not the only way.

Added a link to this issue from the requirements analysis so that your feedback is better included there.

Closing this issue for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
WG input/requirements WG participant submitted feedback or requirements for the project
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants