-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nobody implements isReloadNavigation #1280
Comments
@yutakahirano is there still a blocking implementation issue for this? |
Sorry for the inactivity. I originally planned to implement it, but due to an implementation issue specific to Chrome isReloadNavigation implementation is harder than isHistoryNavigation, and I haven't had time to implement it. I'm OK with removing it given nobody has implemented it. |
I guess I'm concerned with removing it. We originally added |
I think neither |
(Correction: Chrome implemented and ships |
I believe there are real site use cases that needed a "is this a reload of the page" signal. That is why we haven't been able to remove |
Firefox is still willing to implement this based on the original motivations. As is visible in our implementation bug, our implementation stalled on some testing issues and was shelved as we re-focused on our long-term process-model refactor (since addressed), but I believe the testing issues are now hopefully moot (history) or we know how to side-step the issues (pref). That said, it's not clear we can immediately allocate resources to cleaning up and landing the implementation. Given that it seems like the original rationale of w3c/ServiceWorker#1167 still stands, would it be appropriate to |
@yutakahirano Can you share what the implementation difficulties were with implementing isReloadNavigation on the crbug? I might be able to devote some time in the coming quarters to implementing this. |
See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=836697, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1456479, and https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184957 .
It's been a couple of years without movement. Should we remove it from the spec? @yutakahirano @wanderview @youennf @asutherland.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: