-
Developed by Thomas White, Daniel Noble, Alistair Senior, W. Kyle Hamilton, Wolfgang Viechtbauer.
+
Developed by Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Thomas White, Daniel Noble, Alistair Senior, W. Kyle Hamilton.
| study | numeric | study number |
| sample | numeric | sample number |
| author | character | (first) author |
| year | numeric | publication year |
| selection | character | selection of subjects on the basis of eyedness or handedness |
| investigator | character | investigator (psychologist, educationalist, or other) |
| hand_assess | character | method to assess handedness (questionnaire or performance based) |
| eye_assess | character | method to assess eyedness (see ‘Details’) |
| mage | numeric | mean age of sample |
| lh.le | numeric | number of left-handed left-eyed individuals |
| lh.re | numeric | number of left-handed right-eyed individuals |
| rh.le | numeric | number of right-handed left-eyed individuals |
| rh.re | numeric | number of right-handed right-eyed individuals |
| sex | character | sex of the sample (combined, male, or female) |
Details
-
The 47 studies included in this meta-analysis examined the association between handedness and eye-dominance (ocular dominance or eyedness). Results are given in terms of \(2 \times 2\) tables, indicating the number of left-handed left-eyed, left-handed right-eyed, right-handed left-eyed, and right-handed right-eyed individuals. Note that some studies included multiple (independent) samples, so that the meta-analysis included 54 samples in total. Also, for some studies, the combined data of the males and females are further broken down into the two subgroups.
+
The 47 studies included in this meta-analysis examined the association between handedness and eye-dominance (ocular dominance or eyedness). Results are given in terms of \(2 \times 2\) tables, indicating the number of left-handed left-eyed, left-handed right-eyed, right-handed left-eyed, and right-handed right-eyed individuals in each sample. Note that some studies included multiple (independent) samples, so that the meta-analysis included 54 samples in total. Also, for some studies, the combined data of the males and females are further broken down into the two subgroups.
In some studies, there was indication that the selection of subjects was not random with respect to handedness and/or eyedness. While this should not influence the size of the association as measured with the odds ratio, this invalidates those studies for assessing the overall percentage of left-eyed and left-handed individuals.
-
Handedness was assessed in the individual studies either based on a questionnaire or inventory or based on task performance. Eyedness was assessed based on various methods: E.1 methods are based on task performance, while E.2.a denotes assessment based on a questionnaire. The performance based methods could be further broken down into: E.1.a.i (monocular procedure with object/instrument held in one hand), E.1.a.ii (monocular procedure with object/instrument held in both hands), E.1.b (binocular procedure), E.1.c (a combination of the previous methods), and E.1.d (some other method).
+
Handedness was assessed in the individual studies either based on a questionnaire or based on task performance. Eyedness was assessed based on various methods: E.1 methods are based on task performance, while E.2.a denotes assessment based on a questionnaire. The performance based methods could be further broken down into: E.1.a.i (monocular procedure with object/instrument held in one hand), E.1.a.ii (monocular procedure with object/instrument held in both hands), E.1.b (binocular procedure), E.1.c (a combination of the previous methods), and E.1.d (some other method).