-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
named references test failures #4
Comments
Yes, these were all passing. The mods to ebnf-parser require the changes in jison. I just pulled down two fresh copies to be sure. Here is the other pull request: zaach/jison#181. Note that I (believe I) fixed the speed issues in the token stack enhancement, too, but we can get rid of that if it hinders the named references enhancement. |
@cdibbs Yes, could we decouple the PRs? I intend to make the token stack optional either way, like other parser features. |
@zaach Sorry about that. I'm still pretty new to git/github. I can work on making the token stack optional as I find time, later. |
@zaach Thought I'd check in on this - were you ever able to get this working? zaach/jison#185 decouples the PRs. I looked over what I was doing, and the biggest gotcha was that I temporarily sym-linked the updated Jison module into the ebnf-parser node_modules directory before rebuilding ebnf-parser (not sure whether there's a better way to do this). Without the Jison changes at the BNF level, the EBNF stuff cannot work. |
Oh, I didn't notice the new PR. I'll test it out locally – thanks! |
Hey @cdibbs, I'm getting tests failures on the new feature. Were these passing for you? Are you using jison 0.4.10?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: