Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tell user what to do when they enter an invalid command #173

Conversation

ReflectiveObsidian
Copy link

No description provided.

@ReflectiveObsidian ReflectiveObsidian added the priority.low Low priority label Apr 4, 2024
@ReflectiveObsidian ReflectiveObsidian added this to the v1.3 milestone Apr 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.71%. Comparing base (b468a42) to head (8e9ed49).
Report is 27 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #173      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     72.61%   72.71%   +0.09%     
- Complexity      746      790      +44     
============================================
  Files           109      110       +1     
  Lines          2487     2613     +126     
  Branches        308      337      +29     
============================================
+ Hits           1806     1900      +94     
- Misses          612      627      +15     
- Partials         69       86      +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@Bandov Bandov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Bandov Bandov merged commit eba336b into AY2324S2-CS2103T-T11-1:master Apr 4, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority.low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants