Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase test coverage for module models #149

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

AdityaB4
Copy link

No description provided.

@AdityaB4 AdityaB4 added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.70%. Comparing base (4767dbf) to head (6d5248b).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #149      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     64.35%   64.70%   +0.34%     
- Complexity      508      515       +7     
============================================
  Files            98       98              
  Lines          2003     2003              
  Branches        208      208              
============================================
+ Hits           1289     1296       +7     
+ Misses          630      625       -5     
+ Partials         84       82       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AdityaB4 AdityaB4 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2024 10:32
@AdityaB4 AdityaB4 requested a review from a team April 15, 2024 10:32
Copy link

@blaukc blaukc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@AdityaB4 AdityaB4 merged commit bf5f131 into master Apr 15, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants