-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #187: Fix user guide bugs found in PE-D #194
Fixes #187: Fix user guide bugs found in PE-D #194
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great changes! Just a couple of nits that possibly could be improved further, have commented on them below.
@@ -345,8 +340,11 @@ Parameters Restrictions: | |||
|
|||
* The optional index refers to the index number shown in the displayed person list. The index **must be a positive | |||
integer** 1, 2, 3, … | |||
* If the optional index is not provided, all loans, across all clients in the list will be shown. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we say all active loans here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't include it because the next line immediately after this talks about the active loans.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm that is true, but I feel like this could indicate a problematic behaviour in how all loans
are distinguished from all loans, including inactive ones
in the UG. This is because when we say all loans
, it is implicitly implied that they do not include inactive ones, but a user (especially one who has not read anything on all loans, including inactive ones
) might misinterpret that to mean the latter.
Regardless, I'll approve these changes first and we could address this issue in a separate PR.
@@ -430,14 +427,18 @@ Example: `deleteloan 1` | |||
|
|||
### Analysing a client's loan records: `analytics` | |||
|
|||
Provides visual analytics of a client's loan records. | |||
Provides visual analytics of a client's loan records based on three indices: Reliability, Impact, and Urgency. | |||
* The Reliability index is defined as the ratio of overdue loans to the total number of loans. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think we should give examples here? Some users might be unable to visualise the concept of a ratio without an example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered this, but I'm worried that it could get pretty cluttered.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm that is true, perhaps we could add this in another PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright, LGTM! We can create separate PR(s) for the 2 issues I raised if necessary
@@ -345,8 +340,11 @@ Parameters Restrictions: | |||
|
|||
* The optional index refers to the index number shown in the displayed person list. The index **must be a positive | |||
integer** 1, 2, 3, … | |||
* If the optional index is not provided, all loans, across all clients in the list will be shown. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm that is true, but I feel like this could indicate a problematic behaviour in how all loans
are distinguished from all loans, including inactive ones
in the UG. This is because when we say all loans
, it is implicitly implied that they do not include inactive ones, but a user (especially one who has not read anything on all loans, including inactive ones
) might misinterpret that to mean the latter.
Regardless, I'll approve these changes first and we could address this issue in a separate PR.
No description provided.