Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #187: Fix user guide bugs found in PE-D #194

Merged

Conversation

Joseph31416
Copy link

No description provided.

@Joseph31416 Joseph31416 added this to the 1.4 milestone Apr 10, 2024
Copy link

@kjw142857 kjw142857 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great changes! Just a couple of nits that possibly could be improved further, have commented on them below.

@@ -345,8 +340,11 @@ Parameters Restrictions:

* The optional index refers to the index number shown in the displayed person list. The index **must be a positive
integer** 1, 2, 3, …​
* If the optional index is not provided, all loans, across all clients in the list will be shown.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we say all active loans here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't include it because the next line immediately after this talks about the active loans.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm that is true, but I feel like this could indicate a problematic behaviour in how all loans are distinguished from all loans, including inactive ones in the UG. This is because when we say all loans, it is implicitly implied that they do not include inactive ones, but a user (especially one who has not read anything on all loans, including inactive ones) might misinterpret that to mean the latter.

Regardless, I'll approve these changes first and we could address this issue in a separate PR.

@@ -430,14 +427,18 @@ Example: `deleteloan 1`

### Analysing a client's loan records: `analytics`

Provides visual analytics of a client's loan records.
Provides visual analytics of a client's loan records based on three indices: Reliability, Impact, and Urgency.
* The Reliability index is defined as the ratio of overdue loans to the total number of loans.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should give examples here? Some users might be unable to visualise the concept of a ratio without an example.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I considered this, but I'm worried that it could get pretty cluttered.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm that is true, perhaps we could add this in another PR.

@Joseph31416 Joseph31416 requested a review from kjw142857 April 11, 2024 03:28
Copy link

@kjw142857 kjw142857 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, LGTM! We can create separate PR(s) for the 2 issues I raised if necessary

@@ -345,8 +340,11 @@ Parameters Restrictions:

* The optional index refers to the index number shown in the displayed person list. The index **must be a positive
integer** 1, 2, 3, …​
* If the optional index is not provided, all loans, across all clients in the list will be shown.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm that is true, but I feel like this could indicate a problematic behaviour in how all loans are distinguished from all loans, including inactive ones in the UG. This is because when we say all loans, it is implicitly implied that they do not include inactive ones, but a user (especially one who has not read anything on all loans, including inactive ones) might misinterpret that to mean the latter.

Regardless, I'll approve these changes first and we could address this issue in a separate PR.

@kjw142857 kjw142857 merged commit 96149d7 into AY2324S2-CS2103T-W13-1:master Apr 11, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants