-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding a scaled addon to receive the username1 and username2 from query parameters #2
Conversation
@Circuit-Overtime is attempting to deploy a commit to the abbhiishek's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces changes to the project's configuration and home page component. The Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant HomePage
participant URLParams
participant GitHubAPI
User->>URLParams: Provide usernames in URL
URLParams->>HomePage: Extract u1 and u2 parameters
HomePage->>HomePage: Validate usernames
HomePage->>GitHubAPI: Trigger comparison
GitHubAPI-->>HomePage: Return comparison data
HomePage->>User: Display results
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/app/page.tsx (1)
Consider rate limiting and improve error handling
The review comment's concerns are valid. The current implementation:
- Uses a generic error message that hides useful information from the GraphQL and REST API errors
- Makes multiple API calls without checking rate limits
- Doesn't properly handle specific API errors (like rate limiting, user not found)
Key locations that need attention:
src/lib/github.ts
:
- The
fetchGitHubUserData
function makes multiple API calls (user data, repos, languages, contributions) without rate limit checks- The catch block masks the original error with a generic message
- No rate limit pre-check before starting the expensive operation
Suggested implementation approach:
- Add rate limit check before starting the operation
- Preserve and propagate specific error types (RateLimitError, UserNotFoundError)
- Include remaining rate limit information in error messages
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
45-66
: Improve error handling and rate limiting considerationThe current error handling implementation could be enhanced:
- Generic error messages might hide useful information from users
- No handling of GitHub API rate limiting
- Error state persists between comparisons
const handleCompare = async (e?: React.FormEvent) => { if (e) e.preventDefault(); if (!username1 || !username2) { setError('Please enter both usernames'); return; } setIsLoading(true); setError(null); try { + // Add rate limiting check + const rateLimit = await checkGitHubRateLimit(); + if (rateLimit.remaining === 0) { + throw new Error(`GitHub API rate limit exceeded. Reset at ${new Date(rateLimit.reset * 1000)}`); + } + const user1Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username1); const user2Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username2); const roasts = await generateComparison(user1Data, user2Data); setComparisonData({ user1: user1Data, user2: user2Data, roasts, }); } catch (err) { - setError('Failed to fetch comparison data. Please try again later.'); + setError(err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'An unexpected error occurred. Please try again later.'); } finally { setIsLoading(false); } };Let's verify the GitHub API rate limiting implementation:
Let me analyze the GitHub API interaction implementation to verify the rate limiting concerns.
I need to check the actual implementation of the GitHub API calls to verify the error handling and rate limiting implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for rate limit handling in the codebase rg -l "rate limit" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for rate limit handling in the codebase with ripgrep, adjusting file extensions rg -l "rate.?limit" "." -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Search for GitHub API related functions to check rate limit implementation rg "fetchGitHubUserData|checkGitHubRateLimit" "." -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 5Length of output: 1237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the GitHub API implementation to see how errors are handled cat ./src/lib/github.tsLength of output: 10756
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json
(2 hunks)src/app/page.tsx
(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/app/page.tsx
[error] 12-12: 'username1' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 12-12: 'setUsername1' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 13-13: 'username2' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 13-13: 'setUsername2' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
"framer-motion": "^4.1.17", | ||
"lucide-react": "^0.14.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Critical: Confirmed compatibility issues with React dependencies
The verification reveals critical compatibility constraints:
[email protected]
requires React 16.5.1 specifically[email protected]
supports up to React 17 only- Neither package supports React 18 or 19
While no security vulnerabilities were found, these versions are incompatible with modern React versions and will cause runtime errors.
Recommended actions:
- Upgrade
framer-motion
to at least version 10.x for React 18+ support - Upgrade
lucide-react
to at least version 0.200.0 for React 18+ support
🔗 Analysis chain
Critical: Significant dependency downgrades may introduce compatibility issues
The downgrades to much older versions are concerning:
framer-motion
v4.1.17 is from 2021, missing years of improvements and fixeslucide-react
v0.14.0 is significantly older than the current v0.468.0
These older versions might have compatibility issues with React 19 and could introduce security vulnerabilities.
Let's verify the compatibility and security implications:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities in these specific versions
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "framer-motion") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}
'
# Check peer dependency requirements
npm info [email protected] peerDependencies
npm info [email protected] peerDependencies
Length of output: 554
src/app/page.tsx
Outdated
useEffect(() => { | ||
// Only call handleCompare when both usernames are set | ||
if (username1 && username2) { | ||
handleCompare(); | ||
} | ||
}, [username1, username2]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix potential stale closure and unnecessary comparison issues
The current implementation has two potential issues:
handleCompare
is not included in the dependency array, which could lead to stale closure problems- Comparisons might be triggered unnecessarily when usernames are set to the same values
useEffect(() => {
- // Only call handleCompare when both usernames are set
- if (username1 && username2) {
- handleCompare();
- }
-}, [username1, username2]);
+ const prevUsername1 = React.useRef(username1);
+ const prevUsername2 = React.useRef(username2);
+
+ if (username1 && username2 &&
+ (username1 !== prevUsername1.current ||
+ username2 !== prevUsername2.current)) {
+ handleCompare();
+ prevUsername1.current = username1;
+ prevUsername2.current = username2;
+ }
+}, [username1, username2, handleCompare]);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
useEffect(() => { | |
// Only call handleCompare when both usernames are set | |
if (username1 && username2) { | |
handleCompare(); | |
} | |
}, [username1, username2]); | |
useEffect(() => { | |
const prevUsername1 = React.useRef(username1); | |
const prevUsername2 = React.useRef(username2); | |
if (username1 && username2 && | |
(username1 !== prevUsername1.current || | |
username2 !== prevUsername2.current)) { | |
handleCompare(); | |
prevUsername1.current = username1; | |
prevUsername2.current = username2; | |
} | |
}, [username1, username2, handleCompare]); |
src/app/page.tsx
Outdated
useEffect(() => { | ||
const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search); | ||
const u1 = urlParams.get('u1'); | ||
const u2 = urlParams.get('u2'); | ||
|
||
// Validate username format | ||
const isValidUsername = (username: string | null) => /^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/.test(username || ''); | ||
|
||
if (u1 && u2 && isValidUsername(u1) && isValidUsername(u2)) { | ||
setUsername1(u1); | ||
setUsername2(u2); | ||
} | ||
}, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance URL parameter handling and validation
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- The username validation regex is basic and might miss edge cases
- Changes to URL parameters after initial load aren't handled
- The validation logic could be reusable
Consider these improvements:
+// Move to utils/validation.ts
+export const isValidGitHubUsername = (username: string | null): boolean => {
+ if (!username) return false;
+ // GitHub username rules: 1-39 characters, alphanumeric or single hyphens, cannot begin/end with hyphen
+ return /^[a-zA-Z0-9](?:[a-zA-Z0-9]|-(?=[a-zA-Z0-9])){0,38}$/.test(username);
+}
useEffect(() => {
- const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
+ const handleUrlParams = () => {
+ const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
+ const u1 = urlParams.get('u1');
+ const u2 = urlParams.get('u2');
+
+ if (u1 && u2 && isValidGitHubUsername(u1) && isValidGitHubUsername(u2)) {
+ setUsername1(u1);
+ setUsername2(u2);
+ }
+ };
+
+ // Handle initial load and subsequent URL changes
+ handleUrlParams();
+ window.addEventListener('popstate', handleUrlParams);
+ return () => window.removeEventListener('popstate', handleUrlParams);
-}, []);
+}, []);
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/app/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
45-69
: Improve error handling and request managementThe current implementation uses a generic error message and doesn't handle specific error cases or manage concurrent requests.
+ const [controller, setController] = useState<AbortController | null>(null); const handleCompare = async (e?: React.FormEvent) => { if (e) e.preventDefault(); if (!username1 || !username2) { setError('Please enter both usernames'); return; } + // Cancel any in-flight request + controller?.abort(); + const newController = new AbortController(); + setController(newController); setIsLoading(true); setError(null); try { - const user1Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username1); - const user2Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username2); + const user1Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username1, newController.signal); + const user2Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username2, newController.signal); const roasts = await generateComparison(user1Data, user2Data); setComparisonData({ user1: user1Data, user2: user2Data, roasts, }); } catch (err) { - setError('Failed to fetch comparison data. Please try again later.'); + if (err.name === 'AbortError') { + return; + } + if (err.response?.status === 404) { + setError('One or both usernames not found on GitHub'); + } else if (err.response?.status === 403) { + setError('Rate limit exceeded. Please try again later.'); + } else { + setError('Failed to fetch comparison data. Please try again later.'); + } } finally { setIsLoading(false); } };🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 65-65: 'err' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/page.tsx (1)
38-43
: Handle potential race conditions with state updatesThe current implementation might trigger multiple comparisons during rapid state updates. Consider implementing debouncing to prevent unnecessary API calls.
+import { useCallback, useEffect } from 'react'; +import debounce from 'lodash/debounce'; export default function Home() { + const debouncedCompare = useCallback( + debounce(() => { + if (username1 && username2) { + handleCompare(); + } + }, 500), + [handleCompare] + ); useEffect(() => { - if (username1 && username2) { - handleCompare(); - } + debouncedCompare(); + return () => { + debouncedCompare.cancel(); + }; }, [username1, username2]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/page.tsx
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/page.tsx (2)
66-66
: Skip comment - already covered
The error message improvements were addressed in the previous review comment about error handling.
24-36
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance URL parameter validation and error handling
The current implementation could be improved in several ways:
- Add error state handling for invalid usernames in URL parameters
- Consider showing a user-friendly message when invalid parameters are provided
- Add loading state while validating parameters
useEffect(() => {
const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
const u1 = urlParams.get('u1');
const u2 = urlParams.get('u2');
// Validate username format
const isValidUsername = (username: string | null) => /^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/.test(username || '');
if (u1 && u2 && isValidUsername(u1) && isValidUsername(u2)) {
setUsername1(u1);
setUsername2(u2);
- }
+ } else if (u1 || u2) {
+ setError('Invalid username parameters provided in URL');
+ }
}, []);
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
here are the build errors: also go through the coderrabbitai reviews |
c2eadbb
to
03ae893
Compare
Added
useEffect
hook to handle the comparison after both usernames are set, ensuring state updates are completed before triggering the comparison.Fixed
Fixed issue where the comparison wasn't triggered correctly due to asynchronous state updates in React (due to the use of query parameters)
Addressed bug where usernames were not being properly set when passed via URL parameters, resulting in
null
values (due to the use of query parameters)Changed
username1
andusername2
are valid before triggering the comparison.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
handleCompare
function to be more flexible in handling events.Chores
framer-motion
andlucide-react
dependencies.