Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a scaled addon to receive the username1 and username2 from query parameters #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Circuit-Overtime
Copy link

@Circuit-Overtime Circuit-Overtime commented Dec 19, 2024

Added

  • Implemented automatic comparison trigger using URL parameters for GitHub usernames (using regex)
  • Added validation for GitHub usernames in the URL to ensure only valid usernames are used for comparison.
  • Introduced a useEffect hook to handle the comparison after both usernames are set, ensuring state updates are completed before triggering the comparison.

Fixed

  • Fixed issue where the comparison wasn't triggered correctly due to asynchronous state updates in React (due to the use of query parameters)

  • Addressed bug where usernames were not being properly set when passed via URL parameters, resulting in null values (due to the use of query parameters)

Changed

  • Refactored the username validation logic to check if both username1 and username2 are valid before triggering the comparison.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated project name to "github-battle" and version to "1.0.0".
    • Enhanced the Home component to automatically retrieve and validate GitHub usernames from URL parameters.
    • Improved error handling during data fetching for username comparison.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted the handleCompare function to be more flexible in handling events.
  • Chores

    • Downgraded versions of framer-motion and lucide-react dependencies.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 19, 2024

@Circuit-Overtime is attempting to deploy a commit to the abbhiishek's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces changes to the project's configuration and home page component. The package.json file has been updated with a new project name, version, and downgraded dependency versions. The src/app/page.tsx file now includes enhanced URL parameter handling for GitHub usernames, with improved state management and comparison functionality. The modifications aim to improve the application's flexibility and user interaction.

Changes

File Changes
package.json - Renamed project from github-wrapped to github-battle
- Updated version from 0.1.0 to 1.0.0
- Downgraded framer-motion to ^4.1.17
- Downgraded lucide-react to ^0.14.0
src/app/page.tsx - Changed username1 and username2 from const to let
- Modified handleCompare to accept optional event parameter
- Added useEffect hooks for URL parameter username extraction and validation

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant HomePage
    participant URLParams
    participant GitHubAPI

    User->>URLParams: Provide usernames in URL
    URLParams->>HomePage: Extract u1 and u2 parameters
    HomePage->>HomePage: Validate usernames
    HomePage->>GitHubAPI: Trigger comparison
    GitHubAPI-->>HomePage: Return comparison data
    HomePage->>User: Display results
Loading

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
GitHub Battle takes its flight!
Versions dance, parameters sing,
URL magic makes users swing!
Hop along the coding trail,
Where usernames never fail! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/app/page.tsx (1)

Consider rate limiting and improve error handling

The review comment's concerns are valid. The current implementation:

  1. Uses a generic error message that hides useful information from the GraphQL and REST API errors
  2. Makes multiple API calls without checking rate limits
  3. Doesn't properly handle specific API errors (like rate limiting, user not found)

Key locations that need attention:

  • src/lib/github.ts:
    • The fetchGitHubUserData function makes multiple API calls (user data, repos, languages, contributions) without rate limit checks
    • The catch block masks the original error with a generic message
    • No rate limit pre-check before starting the expensive operation

Suggested implementation approach:

  1. Add rate limit check before starting the operation
  2. Preserve and propagate specific error types (RateLimitError, UserNotFoundError)
  3. Include remaining rate limit information in error messages
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 45-66: Improve error handling and rate limiting consideration

The current error handling implementation could be enhanced:

  1. Generic error messages might hide useful information from users
  2. No handling of GitHub API rate limiting
  3. Error state persists between comparisons
 const handleCompare = async (e?: React.FormEvent) => {
   if (e) e.preventDefault();
   if (!username1 || !username2) {
     setError('Please enter both usernames');
     return;
   }

   setIsLoading(true);
   setError(null);

   try {
+    // Add rate limiting check
+    const rateLimit = await checkGitHubRateLimit();
+    if (rateLimit.remaining === 0) {
+      throw new Error(`GitHub API rate limit exceeded. Reset at ${new Date(rateLimit.reset * 1000)}`);
+    }
+
     const user1Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username1);
     const user2Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username2);
     const roasts = await generateComparison(user1Data, user2Data);

     setComparisonData({
       user1: user1Data,
       user2: user2Data,
       roasts,
     });
   } catch (err) {
-    setError('Failed to fetch comparison data. Please try again later.');
+    setError(err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'An unexpected error occurred. Please try again later.');
   } finally {
     setIsLoading(false);
   }
 };

Let's verify the GitHub API rate limiting implementation:


Let me analyze the GitHub API interaction implementation to verify the rate limiting concerns.


I need to check the actual implementation of the GitHub API calls to verify the error handling and rate limiting implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for rate limit handling in the codebase
rg -l "rate limit" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for rate limit handling in the codebase with ripgrep, adjusting file extensions
rg -l "rate.?limit" "." -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

# Search for GitHub API related functions to check rate limit implementation
rg "fetchGitHubUserData|checkGitHubRateLimit" "." -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 5

Length of output: 1237


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the GitHub API implementation to see how errors are handled
cat ./src/lib/github.ts

Length of output: 10756

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2eca76d and 09ed45f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • src/app/page.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/app/page.tsx

[error] 12-12: 'username1' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

(prefer-const)


[error] 12-12: 'setUsername1' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

(prefer-const)


[error] 13-13: 'username2' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

(prefer-const)


[error] 13-13: 'setUsername2' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.

(prefer-const)

Comment on lines +16 to +17
"framer-motion": "^4.1.17",
"lucide-react": "^0.14.0",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Confirmed compatibility issues with React dependencies

The verification reveals critical compatibility constraints:

While no security vulnerabilities were found, these versions are incompatible with modern React versions and will cause runtime errors.

Recommended actions:

  • Upgrade framer-motion to at least version 10.x for React 18+ support
  • Upgrade lucide-react to at least version 0.200.0 for React 18+ support
🔗 Analysis chain

Critical: Significant dependency downgrades may introduce compatibility issues

The downgrades to much older versions are concerning:

  • framer-motion v4.1.17 is from 2021, missing years of improvements and fixes
  • lucide-react v0.14.0 is significantly older than the current v0.468.0

These older versions might have compatibility issues with React 19 and could introduce security vulnerabilities.

Let's verify the compatibility and security implications:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities in these specific versions
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "framer-motion") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}
'

# Check peer dependency requirements
npm info [email protected] peerDependencies
npm info [email protected] peerDependencies

Length of output: 554

src/app/page.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/app/page.tsx Outdated
Comment on lines 38 to 54
useEffect(() => {
// Only call handleCompare when both usernames are set
if (username1 && username2) {
handleCompare();
}
}, [username1, username2]);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix potential stale closure and unnecessary comparison issues

The current implementation has two potential issues:

  1. handleCompare is not included in the dependency array, which could lead to stale closure problems
  2. Comparisons might be triggered unnecessarily when usernames are set to the same values
 useEffect(() => {
-  // Only call handleCompare when both usernames are set
-  if (username1 && username2) {
-    handleCompare();
-  }
-}, [username1, username2]);
+  const prevUsername1 = React.useRef(username1);
+  const prevUsername2 = React.useRef(username2);
+
+  if (username1 && username2 && 
+      (username1 !== prevUsername1.current || 
+       username2 !== prevUsername2.current)) {
+    handleCompare();
+    prevUsername1.current = username1;
+    prevUsername2.current = username2;
+  }
+}, [username1, username2, handleCompare]);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
useEffect(() => {
// Only call handleCompare when both usernames are set
if (username1 && username2) {
handleCompare();
}
}, [username1, username2]);
useEffect(() => {
const prevUsername1 = React.useRef(username1);
const prevUsername2 = React.useRef(username2);
if (username1 && username2 &&
(username1 !== prevUsername1.current ||
username2 !== prevUsername2.current)) {
handleCompare();
prevUsername1.current = username1;
prevUsername2.current = username2;
}
}, [username1, username2, handleCompare]);

src/app/page.tsx Outdated
Comment on lines 24 to 41
useEffect(() => {
const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
const u1 = urlParams.get('u1');
const u2 = urlParams.get('u2');

// Validate username format
const isValidUsername = (username: string | null) => /^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/.test(username || '');

if (u1 && u2 && isValidUsername(u1) && isValidUsername(u2)) {
setUsername1(u1);
setUsername2(u2);
}
}, []);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance URL parameter handling and validation

The current implementation has several areas for improvement:

  1. The username validation regex is basic and might miss edge cases
  2. Changes to URL parameters after initial load aren't handled
  3. The validation logic could be reusable

Consider these improvements:

+// Move to utils/validation.ts
+export const isValidGitHubUsername = (username: string | null): boolean => {
+  if (!username) return false;
+  // GitHub username rules: 1-39 characters, alphanumeric or single hyphens, cannot begin/end with hyphen
+  return /^[a-zA-Z0-9](?:[a-zA-Z0-9]|-(?=[a-zA-Z0-9])){0,38}$/.test(username);
+}

 useEffect(() => {
-  const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
+  const handleUrlParams = () => {
+    const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
+    const u1 = urlParams.get('u1');
+    const u2 = urlParams.get('u2');
+    
+    if (u1 && u2 && isValidGitHubUsername(u1) && isValidGitHubUsername(u2)) {
+      setUsername1(u1);
+      setUsername2(u2);
+    }
+  };
+  
+  // Handle initial load and subsequent URL changes
+  handleUrlParams();
+  window.addEventListener('popstate', handleUrlParams);
+  return () => window.removeEventListener('popstate', handleUrlParams);
-}, []);
+}, []);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/app/page.tsx (1)

Line range hint 45-69: Improve error handling and request management

The current implementation uses a generic error message and doesn't handle specific error cases or manage concurrent requests.

+  const [controller, setController] = useState<AbortController | null>(null);

   const handleCompare = async (e?: React.FormEvent) => {
     if (e) e.preventDefault();
     if (!username1 || !username2) {
       setError('Please enter both usernames');
       return;
     }

+    // Cancel any in-flight request
+    controller?.abort();
+    const newController = new AbortController();
+    setController(newController);

     setIsLoading(true);
     setError(null);

     try {
-      const user1Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username1);
-      const user2Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username2);
+      const user1Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username1, newController.signal);
+      const user2Data = await fetchGitHubUserData(username2, newController.signal);
       const roasts = await generateComparison(user1Data, user2Data);

       setComparisonData({
         user1: user1Data,
         user2: user2Data,
         roasts,
       });
     } catch (err) {
-      setError('Failed to fetch comparison data. Please try again later.');
+      if (err.name === 'AbortError') {
+        return;
+      }
+      if (err.response?.status === 404) {
+        setError('One or both usernames not found on GitHub');
+      } else if (err.response?.status === 403) {
+        setError('Rate limit exceeded. Please try again later.');
+      } else {
+        setError('Failed to fetch comparison data. Please try again later.');
+      }
     } finally {
       setIsLoading(false);
     }
   };
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 65-65: 'err' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/page.tsx (1)

38-43: Handle potential race conditions with state updates

The current implementation might trigger multiple comparisons during rapid state updates. Consider implementing debouncing to prevent unnecessary API calls.

+import { useCallback, useEffect } from 'react';
+import debounce from 'lodash/debounce';

 export default function Home() {
+  const debouncedCompare = useCallback(
+    debounce(() => {
+      if (username1 && username2) {
+        handleCompare();
+      }
+    }, 500),
+    [handleCompare]
+  );

   useEffect(() => {
-    if (username1 && username2) {
-      handleCompare();
-    }
+    debouncedCompare();
+    return () => {
+      debouncedCompare.cancel();
+    };
   }, [username1, username2]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09ed45f and c2eadbb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/page.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/page.tsx (2)

66-66: Skip comment - already covered

The error message improvements were addressed in the previous review comment about error handling.


24-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance URL parameter validation and error handling

The current implementation could be improved in several ways:

  1. Add error state handling for invalid usernames in URL parameters
  2. Consider showing a user-friendly message when invalid parameters are provided
  3. Add loading state while validating parameters
 useEffect(() => {
   const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);
   const u1 = urlParams.get('u1');
   const u2 = urlParams.get('u2');

   // Validate username format
   const isValidUsername = (username: string | null) => /^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/.test(username || '');

   if (u1 && u2 && isValidUsername(u1) && isValidUsername(u2)) {
     setUsername1(u1);
     setUsername2(u2);
-  } 
+  } else if (u1 || u2) {
+    setError('Invalid username parameters provided in URL');
+  }
 }, []);

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 20, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
github-battle ❌ Failed (Inspect) Dec 20, 2024 3:45am

@Abbhiishek
Copy link
Owner

@Circuit-Overtime

here are the build errors:

image

also go through the coderrabbitai reviews

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants