Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auro-library: Automatable repo template updates #32

Closed
Patrick-Daly-AA opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #34
Closed

auro-library: Automatable repo template updates #32

Patrick-Daly-AA opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #34
Assignees

Comments

@Patrick-Daly-AA
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

As an Auro Dev
I want to keep our repos updated with the current template in the WC Generator
So that we spend less time manually updating the repos

Describe the solution you'd like

I can quickly execute a minor update within the repo to bring it in line with the standard template (docs, github issue templates, github actions, etc)

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

See ADO issue #915956

@jordanjones243 jordanjones243 linked a pull request Aug 21, 2023 that will close this issue
6 tasks
blackfalcon pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2023
# [1.1.0](v1.0.2...v1.1.0) (2023-08-31)

### Bug Fixes

* **err:** update parameter handling ([04af13a](04af13a))

### Features

* **automation:** add automation scripts for workflows and linters [#32](#32) ([5dff1b7](5dff1b7))
* **surge:** add workflow that deploys surge demo [#35](#35) ([7117212](7117212))

### Performance Improvements

* **.npmignore:** update .npmignore ([2de9db7](2de9db7))
* **docs:** add generateDocs script [#36](#36) ([9746820](9746820))
* **extraction:** extract functions and insert into library utils [#36](#36) ([c3018eb](c3018eb))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants