-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ACS-6748] BasicAlfrescoAuthService.requireAlfTicket should not be in adf/core #9393
[ACS-6748] BasicAlfrescoAuthService.requireAlfTicket should not be in adf/core #9393
Conversation
lib/content-services/src/lib/auth-loader/content-auth-loader-factory.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@dominikiwanekhyland could you please add some unit tests to new code? |
lib/content-services/src/lib/auth-loader/content-auth-loader.service.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/content-services/src/lib/auth-loader/content-auth-loader.service.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
4f79f1b
to
a3e2086
Compare
a3e2086
to
0f60768
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good work so far!
lib/content-services/src/lib/auth-loader/content-auth-loader.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
… adf/core - fix after CR
0f60768
to
9918229
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
great work! thanks for fixing this!
… adf/core - fix after CR
625315d
to
ab70d01
Compare
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")
What is the current behaviour? (You can also link to an open issue here)
requireAlfTicket is triggered in apps which don't need it and it causes errors in console.
What is the new behaviour?
https://alfresco.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-6748
requireAlfTicket method is triggered only when necessary.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")
If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...
Other information: