Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GCS_MAVLink: add capability to send autopilot to config error loop #29207

Merged

Conversation

peterbarker
Copy link
Contributor

another one of our "do nasty thing to autopilot" commands, useful for testing what ground control stations do when the autopilot is in this state

@peterbarker peterbarker force-pushed the pr/config-error-command-thing branch from c3ab3af to ccd73e7 Compare February 1, 2025 12:12
@peterbarker
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested in SITL, works as expected.

Tested on a CubeOrangePlus, works as expected.

Copy link
Collaborator

@robertlong13 robertlong13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested that this command correctly borks stuff up in current Planner. The U~ looks like the start of a rather long MAVLink 0.9 packet and wipes out at least the next two subsequent MAVLink messages.

Of course, after ArduPilot/MissionPlanner#3483, things work fine.

libraries/GCS_MAVLink/GCS_Common.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Bob Long <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michelle Rossouw <[email protected]>

another one of our "do nasty thing to autopilot" commands, useful for testing what ground control stations do when the autopilot is in this state
@peterbarker peterbarker force-pushed the pr/config-error-command-thing branch from ccd73e7 to 3c4102a Compare February 1, 2025 21:53
@peterbarker peterbarker merged commit 2cd3970 into ArduPilot:master Feb 2, 2025
100 checks passed
@peterbarker peterbarker deleted the pr/config-error-command-thing branch February 3, 2025 01:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants