-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: IVC integration tests using new accumulate model #7946
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f7d3ec9
remove use of accumulate altogether for aztec_ivc
ledwards2225 253b6ac
add nontrivial databus data; tests pass and failure mode works
ledwards2225 f6105d0
failure test for databus consistency checks
ledwards2225 f50f0e6
change method name to accumulate and clean up
ledwards2225 8fbfcd6
more cleanup and comments
ledwards2225 43f015f
Merge branch 'master' into lde/accumulate_redux
ledwards2225 a5c55bf
upodate bloc sizes after master merge
ledwards2225 020b63a
Merge branch 'master' into lde/accumulate_redux
ledwards2225 654e8df
add explicit bench tracking of prover polys constructor
ledwards2225 77d65f2
add TODO
ledwards2225 7bb6789
Merge branch 'master' into lde/accumulate_redux
ledwards2225 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this is not worth measuring?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well it's still measured but its measured all at once as part of circuit construction in the benchmark. Maybe its better to keep it here and add BB_OP_COUNT_TIME_NAME("construct_circuits"); to the mock circuit methods individually
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh but I guess I didn't do this because it threw off the bench because the circuits are constructed twice sometimes for the precomputed vk stuff